Hillary ‘Super Volunteers’ Warn Reporter Against Using ‘Sexist’ Words

Breitbart/Big Government ^ | March 26, 2015 | Staff

[BenLurkin]

Sexist words, according to the group, include: “polarizing,” “calculating,” “disingenuous,” “insincere,” “ambitious,” “inevitable,” “entitled,” “over confident,” “secretive,” will do anything to win,” “represents the past,” and “out of touch.”

“You are on notice that we will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism,” the group reportedly wrote her.

[AppyPappy]

Like they did with Sarah Palin?

[Doogle]

like *smiling*

[tet68]

Get yer Hillary! Clinton Dog Whistle decoder now!

[laplata]

A starving Hyena has more integrity than Hitlery.

[MeshugeMikey]

“will do anything to win,”

“will do anything to win,”?

did they say “will do anything to win,”?”?

[Texas Eagle]

"You mean like, 'sweetie'"?

[Uncle Miltie]

Satire is supposed to be labelled.

[Nekman]

That is strange...I don't see liar, scheming,pathological or bisexual in the list.

[Lazamataz]

These people would make George Orwell blush.

[Texas Eagle]

Okay. So "Hitlery", "Cankles", "Her Royal Heinous", "Pantsuitpalooza" and "Thunder-Thighs" are still acceptable?

Okay. Thanks for clearing that up.

[Carl Vehse]

In the meantime, Hellary, the demonicrats, and the fifth-column MSM leftists will continue to use the words in the lies they defecate about Ted Cruz.

[Texas Eagle]

These people would make George Orwell blush.

Or sue them for plagiarism.

[Paine in the Neck]

Looks like they are all in on replicating Obama’s “racist” campaign, this time with “sexist”.

[Slyfox]

“polarizing,” “calculating,” “disingenuous,” “insincere,” “ambitious,” “inevitable,” “entitled,” “over confident,” “secretive,”

They all spell HILLARY.

[Zeppo]

I don’t see “witch”, “broomstick”, “harridan”, “enabler”, “Communist”, “Marxist”, “carpetbagger”, “hysterical”, “doddering”, “thieving”, “pantsuit”, “pantload”, “cankles”, or “congenital liar” on that list.

So, have at it.

[Stosh]

I didn’t think that skank Hillary could be any more polarizing than she has been, but this is typical of that calculating b*tch, and so disingenuous I can hardly believe it. I don’t think we’ve ever had a more insincere candidate, and only her husband was more ambitious. She thinks she’s inevitable, or at least entitled to the nomination, but I’m afraid that’s just another case of her being over confident. Maybe if she wasn’t so secretive the public wouldn’t get the impression that she’ll do anything to win. Luckily she represents the past, and is so out of touch that I expect she’ll just self-implode.

[BenLurkin]

Not satire evidently — but it does look a little as though the NYT reporterette is being pawned.

[Dr. Thorne]

How about “ugly”, “evil”, “stupid”, “venal”, “wicked”, “scummy” and “pig-faced”?

[KarlInOhio]

Sexist? I've heard and seen many of those same terms used by the leftist press against Ted Cruz just this week. I guess it is OK to use them against an "uppity" (yes, the New Yorker used that word until they were called on it and then sent it down the memory hole) Hispanic.