Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is the Army version of the Air Force F-35 program. Lots of people are getting rich off the endless procurement system for this rifle at the expense of the taxpayer.
1 posted on 03/24/2015 6:35:39 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Redcitizen

The AR-15 is a civilian version of a military carbine that Armalite was (unsuccessfully) trying to sell to the Pentagon’ Is it still a viable candidate (technically, not politically) for the Army now?


2 posted on 03/24/2015 6:40:34 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

Anything - as long as they keep the field proven direct impingement system and don’t put any of those new-fangled gas pistons in there.


3 posted on 03/24/2015 6:44:53 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

...all components desired are currently available at Brownells.com...


6 posted on 03/24/2015 6:50:23 PM PDT by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

They could do a lot worse than a Colt AR-15 HBar. I had one, actually several, and loved it. Extremely accurate and that 20 inch barrel is still pretty short.

Since it would not be as handy as an M4, every soldier could be issued one of those FN pistols which hold a huge number of rounds.

Some could be issued a highly accurate longer barreled scoped semi auto in something like the 6.5 Carcano or 6.5 Greek .243 etc.

Just fun to try to figure out especially since I won’t have to use them.


7 posted on 03/24/2015 6:52:11 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen
See AR15Builder.com...
8 posted on 03/24/2015 6:55:47 PM PDT by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

The first step would be to move up to a caliber that ends a fight with one hit.I gave up on 5.56 as a serious caliber years ago,give me a 7.62x51.


9 posted on 03/24/2015 7:00:14 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

Go with the 3.8 pound OIP variant in .243 Winchester with th HK piston design.

http://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/oip-3-8-pound-ar-shot-show-2015/


10 posted on 03/24/2015 7:06:16 PM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen
This is the Army version of the Air Force F-35 program.

There's a lot of truth to that statement.

13 posted on 03/24/2015 7:17:55 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


22 posted on 03/24/2015 7:58:05 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

I suggest they return to .30 caliber weapons.


23 posted on 03/24/2015 8:01:23 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

My father says they need to bring back the M1 Garand or at least the M-14. Even so, I always thought if they had to go to a sub .30 caliber round, I always thought they should have used the .270 Winchester or the .243 Winchester or something similar.


24 posted on 03/24/2015 8:20:07 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

The M4 is basically an up to date CAR-15.


25 posted on 03/24/2015 8:20:48 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen
The Army could do two things that would increase both the lethality and reliability of its legacy 5.56 NATO weapons.

1. Standardize the 6.8 SPC (6.8 Remington) as a replacement for the 5.56 NATO. [The 6.8 SPC was specifically designed to work in weapons designed for the 5.56 NATO cartridge.]

2. Standardize a gas piston drive upper receiver like the HK416 and that will cure the carbine's reliability problems.

3. All legacy weapons in inventory could be easily converted to the new caliber by changing barrels, bolt assemblies (and carriers), magazines, and modifying the M27 links to 6.8 SPC for the M219/Mk 46 SAW. Change over would cost far less than a new rifle and training and logistics would hardly be affected.

Either that or start issuing the .30 caliber M1 carbines issued as control weapons for the last M5 carbine tests that the troops preferred over the M4! The US Army has been a total cluster flock when it has tried to replace the M4 carbines.

40 posted on 03/24/2015 10:15:32 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson