Posted on 03/23/2015 2:14:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Obama got away with being ineligible because the GOP was afraid of being called racist by the media. Ted Cruz doesn’t have that luxury.
There are about 4 anti Cruz Freepers
Statistical noise
They are morons.
Cruz is aware that he will have enemies on all four sides and he’s moving forward anyway. He probably has looked at his candidacy and thinks he’s eligible.
There is nobody I like more than Ted Cruz. But he is NOT a natural born Citizen. He would make a great attorney general.
“And a lot of these FReepers would slice their noses off to spite their faces.
It has been done before. I hope that we do not have a repeat. “
Michael Jackson?
Cruz knows all about Natural Law. I think he is running to expose Obama as ineligible.
My local news (liberal biased) here in Florida is already running stories about Cruz and eligibility.
But, the whiners seem to never consider the truth - Cruz’s mother WAS A LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZEN. That automatically makes him a “natural born citizen”.
The fact that he was born in Canada is a non-entity. He could have been born to his mother in any other country in the world, and he would still be a US CITIZEN. And, while he did have DUAL-Citizenship with Canada (because that country has to register the birth) - Cruz has already renounced his Canadian portion.
Proving that Trump doesn’t know SQUAT!
And, once again, Jim Robinson has said - it’s a closed issue on FR.
ha ha— i thought the same thing - that would be awesome to see
ODimwit was eligible and Cruz is eligible. This is a ridiculous, absurd issue for either.
Let that sink in a minute while considering Obama.
Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term natural born citizen to any other category than those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof.
Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same
"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.
A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789
The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law
My understanding is that the bulk of legal scholars believe Cruz is eligible.
Thanks for sharing. I wondered where levin was on Ted Cruz. I certainly trust his opinion on his Constitutional
eligibilty.
Your post makes a lot of sense. Based on the position of those who say he is ineligible because he was born in Canada, anyone whose mother may have been out of the country when they were born would not be U.S. citizens. Ridiculous.
And the bulk of scientists believe in global warming.
Think for yourself.
If we can elect a Kenyan communist, a Canadian conservative if fine with me.
Trump is so light weight in his brain, it should be floating in air. He knows nothing of who is a natural born citizen and who is not. Cruz’s mom was an American citizen, so Cruz is a natural born citizen. He didn’t have to go through naturalization to be a citizen - those who have to go through the naturalization process are not natural born. It’s just not complicated.
I was among te early “birthers” but walked away from the issue when it became apparent that we were being flooded with trolls who seemed to want to use the issue to manipulate.
I think we’ll be seeing a lot of them returning to “stand on principle”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.