Posted on 03/04/2015 11:47:34 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
PPP's newest North Carolina poll provides just the latest evidence of a Scott Walker surge among GOP voters. Walker leads the Republican field in the state with 24% to 17% for Jeb Bush, 15% for Mike Huckabee, and 12% for Ben Carson. PPP has now had three polls in a row- this one in North Carolina, one two weeks ago nationally, and one three weeks ago in South Carolina- where Walker, Bush, Huckabee, and Carson have all hit double digits while none of the rest of the GOP contenders have. For the time that quartet seems to be the top tier in the GOP race. Rounding out the field are Marco Rubio at 7%, Chris Christie and Rand Paul at 5%, and Ted Cruz and Rick Perry at 3%.
Everyone's standing is within a few points of where it was a month ago in our North Carolina poll with the exception of Walker whose support has increased by 10 points. Walker is doing well based on his appeal to 'very conservative' voters in the state. With them he's getting 32% to just 12% for Bush. Bush has an equally large lead with moderates- 28% to Walker's 8%- but there are twice as many voters who identify as 'very conservative' as moderate so it's not getting him very far.
Bush's problem continues to be that conservatives have become very suspicious of him since he announced in December that he would likely run for President. Before his announcement he had a 63/19 favorability with 'very conservative' voters in the state- now it's 39/35. Meanwhile as Walker becomes better known to Republicans in the state they're almost universally adopting positive opinions of him- last month he was at 47/11 with GOP voters in the state, now it's 56/12.
Chris Christie- already viewed tepidly by Republicans in North Carolina- is now outright disliked by them in the state. In December his favorability was 42/32, now it's 30/44 for a 24 point net decline in just over two months. Even moderates (25/42) don't care for him anymore. Ted Cruz (48/19), Rand Paul (49/22), Rick Perry (51/17), and Marco Rubio (also 51/17) are perfectly well liked by GOP voters in the state but they're just not catching fire in the way other new faces like Walker and Carson are. It's particularly noteworthy that among 'very conservative' voters, who would have to be the base of Cruz's support if he's going to get anywhere, he's in only 5th place at 7%.
The general election for President in North Carolina looks like it's setting up to be a toss up for a third straight time after being the second closest state in the country in both 2008 and 2012. Hillary Clinton is within 4 points of all nine Republicans we tested against her. The only one who actually leads Clinton is Ben Carson at 46/45. She is also tied with Mike Huckabee at 46%. Beyond that Clinton leads the other seven Republicans but in all cases it's pretty close. She has a 2 point advantage over Scott Walker at 45/43. She's up 3 on Chris Christie (45/42), Rand Paul (46/43), and Rick Perry (47/44). And her lead is 4 points over Jeb Bush (46/42), Marco Rubio (also 46/42), and Ted Cruz (47/43). It's early but it looks like North Carolina could be close once again. Clinton continues to dominate the Democratic primary field in the state. She's at 56% to 13% for Elizabeth Warren, 11% for Joe Biden, 3% each for Martin O'Malley and Jim Webb, and 1% for Bernie Sanders. Clinton is getting more than 50% support from liberals, moderates, men, women, whites, African Americans, and voters within every age group.
Public Policy Polling (PPP) is a U.S. polling firm based in Raleigh, North Carolina.[1] PPP was founded in 2001 by businessman Dean Debnam, the firm’s current president and Chief Executive Officer.[2]
PPP is described as one of the “most accurate” polling companies[3][4] and also as a “Democratic-leaning”[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.
In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipsters should be subjected to a special tax for being annoying
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Policy_Polling
PPP = “Most accurate” LOL!
Can a polling firm be exclusively Democratic/Progressive and most accurate? Inquiring minds want to know.
fwiw:
“PPP surveyed 849 registered North Carolina voters, including 389 Republican primary voters and 401 Democratic primary voters, from February 24th to 26th . The margin of error for the survey is +/- 3.4%, +/- 5.0 for the GOP sample, and +/- 4.9 for the Democratic portion. 80% of interviews for the poll were conducted over the phone with 20% interviewed over the internet to reach respondents who don’t have landline telephones.”
This seems to be the same trend in CA, TX, IOWA, FL, NH.... with pollsters across the spectrum.
Name recognition. If Mike Huckabee or even Fred Karger were getting that much press, they’d probably be trending upwards, too. He has to thread the needle between the GOPe and the Tea Party. That’ll be difficult to do for almost two years. But I agree, right now he’s doing VERY well.
Who cares about polls now. We’re just under a year away from the first primary / caucus - a political eternity
Since we’re so far down the line in Primary voting it’s a wonder they even waste money doing the polls.
My Primary vote is usually a protest vote against the leader.
Money is lining up behind candidates. Campaigns never get off the ground without a lot of support and backing.
If a candidate can be defined and marginalized early on, their support and money dry up before they get going.
That’s why the onslaught against Walker.
Good! Go big, go bold!
Two commnetson this.
It appears Scott Walker’s popularity increases everytime an attack is lanched on him. Those attacks are raising his name recognition and those looking into him seemto be liking what they see.
All polling firms do national presidential polls. IE. Clinton vs whoever. They are useless, the only relevant polling is ones that poll state by state and produce a electoral college count.
...but don’t get me wrong. Between Walker and Cruz, I vote Cruz. Between Walker and ANYONE ELSE, I vote Walker.
Unlike Perry, I do like Walker.
Walker’s past statements on immigration were intensely liberal enough that I get that “Boehner feeling” every time I hear his name.
They have to avoid talking about Hillary!'s numbers after her private server (not Huma :D) was hacked or Obama's unconstitutional Iran deal (if he tries to bypass Congress).
Let's see those numbers!
Now, that's what happened with that old American favorite "Bill" "Clinton" and now with HRC too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
