Posted on 03/03/2015 3:52:48 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-03/boehner-outfoxes-his-critics-again-?cmpid=yhoo
Yeah sure right...
Sounds about right.
ROFLMAO !!!!
These stupid short sighted evil people like Bonehad and Mitchy Boo and McCarthy, and Ryan sold out there own families and county to cheap labor K street lobby which will also die out when all the illegals are legal !
Bonehead the alcoholic crook just destroyed our country Folks!
Bending over and spreading your cheeks is not my idea of “outfoxing” anyone.
“I’m not a loser because I don’t even try.” ~ Boner
Posted in Free Republic Wisconsin state board
Suggested Johnson Questionaire
...Please print up as one page front and back using body copy as your master. Encircle or underline your preferences marked off in ( parenthesis .) Sign and date it. Fold and insert it into business sized envelope with your return name and address on it. While personally addressing it Stamp and mail to;
United States Senator
Hon Ron Johnson
325 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington DC 20510
Body copy
Dear Senator Johnson:
We are tired of bills are not being read and billion$ and trillion$ of dollars in legislation called omnibus bills get passed. Fundings then get shoveled into agencies with the results being government intrusion as well as its employees that grow into our lives regulating US how we; eat, sleep, pray, get married , and think..
This questionaire contains opinions with positions voters feel you should have or be taking concerning the course this country should be heading. It has been freely distributed and not directed to a selected demographic to produce a given result..
Should Senator Johnson vote no on any such 1000 page or more Omnibus funding bills of extended duration beyond 60 days if congress doesn’t do it’s job and consider (read) what it’s passing? (Yes) or (NO) ? If he votes no the socialists will scream “government shutdown”. Will you still support him? (Y) (N) (Maybe). Should Obama care be (fixed) or (dumped) And if he votes to fix and not dump it will you support him for another term (YES) or (NO)?
EPA...This agency is out of control INS....Immigration out of control IRS...Out of Control
The people who head these agencies get approved by the senate and swear an oath to support the constitution not the executive branch or the president.
Should he support Senate hearings ? Investigating their funding and operation (Y)(N)
If such officers are found guilty of abusing or exceeding their legislative authorization .
Should he support their encircle which ( censure) (impeachment) (defunding)...If he refuses to do so will you still support him in 2016 (Yes) or (No)
EPA Own waterfront property? You can’t clear your waterfront jungle. Pay more for the b/s in your gas & idiot lites in your car. Watch what you flush because higher electric bills will save the world and the bankrupt campaign contributers in the solar industry.
It is time to reign in EPA Funding? (Y)(N)
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We don’t allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
Yet we’re letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting that practice be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) .Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ?
In “countries where an American citizen decides to be a “legal” emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
I (do) (don’t) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)
Very Truly Yours For Conservative Government
Next TWO years??!?
Aren't YOU the optimist.
Well, you could be right, but after the next two years it won’t matter much anyway and the Ministry of Truth will be in charge of all broadcasts and other communications to assure that only Dear Leader approved views are disseminated. FR will have to become pirate internet from a server in Bulgaria.
From the article:
In any case, letting Rule XXII run its course this time around was, supposedly, a way for Boehner to avert a mutiny in his conference and avoid accusations he had “caved” on fighting against Obama’s executive actions. The Ohio Republican would only be following the rules.
Boehner agreed, according to a Democratic aide familiar with the events, though a House Republican aide also close to conversations told CQ Roll Call that, despite Pelosi’s push for a commitment to bring up the Senate bill, there was “no deal,” as Boehner would only be agreeing to follow “regular order.”
Either way, by Monday, after CQ Roll Call had reported over the weekend on the possibility of the legislative tactic, conservatives were catching on.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, introduced an amendment to turn off Rule XXII, and pressure was mounting. Conservatives felt Republicans had an obligation to fight the president’s executive action, while a group of moderates believed it was the responsibility of Republicans to govern and fund DHS.
“You’ve got your nose so far up Boneheads butt you’re in danger of smothering.”
Lol! Your mother is calling you ...
What do you expect from a "man" that spends time at tanning salons and cries more than most six-year-old girls.
Obama must be giddy to have such a creature heading the "opposition".
ROTFLMAO...Projecting much about your mother?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
