Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Not Interested in Taking A-10 Warthogs from Air Force
Foxnews ^ | 2/25/15 | Unknown

Posted on 03/03/2015 7:01:08 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Well, so much for that option.
1 posted on 03/03/2015 7:01:08 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

They could always give them to police departments; I mean they’ve already given them all kinds of equipment like armored vehicles.

/sarc


2 posted on 03/03/2015 7:05:00 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Seems like the Marines would want them.


3 posted on 03/03/2015 7:06:31 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Eh.
It's impractical, anyway.

With A-10s they have to get:
1. A-10 maintenance parts in their supply system.
2. A-10 training for their helo mechanics.
3. Transfer all those A-10 Air Force pilots to the Army (fat chance).
4. Find sufficient operation support (fixed wing is going to have different requirements).

That's just off the top of my head, and I'm not in the A-10 community.

4 posted on 03/03/2015 7:07:29 AM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I doubt this has anything to do with the capability of the aircraft. The Army is struggling to pay the bills for their existing programs, so there is no way for them to accept any platform on those terms. If they are given the aircraft, without the funding slice to support/integrate them, they would have to pay for sustainment, operations, facilities, and likely new training/staffing, as well as the cost of figuring out how to integrate them doctrinely and organizationally with the existing force. This would be a very large bill indeed.


5 posted on 03/03/2015 7:08:41 AM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

“Seems like the Marines would want them.”

All they need are some tailhooks.


6 posted on 03/03/2015 7:09:09 AM PST by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I’ll take them.


7 posted on 03/03/2015 7:09:10 AM PST by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Shows that promotions to upper ranks in the Army are now based on political reliability more than on talent, insight or love of country. Rejecting one of the best tools in the chest is not good policy.

Give ‘em to the Marines; I’ll bet they’d love ‘em!


8 posted on 03/03/2015 7:09:52 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave
I doubt this has anything to do with the capability of the aircraft. The Army is struggling to pay the bills for their existing programs, so there is no way for them to accept any platform on those terms. If they are given the aircraft, without the funding slice to support/integrate them, they would have to pay for sustainment, operations, facilities, and likely new training/staffing, as well as the cost of figuring out how to integrate them doctrinely and organizationally with the existing force. This would be a very large bill indeed.

This, among other reasons.

9 posted on 03/03/2015 7:10:56 AM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
That’s an Air Force mission as it should be and I’m sure the Air Force feels the same way,” McHugh said.

Inter-military squabbles are detrimental to a nation's defense. If they would consider the MISSION instead of their EGOS the we would be a whole lot better off.....................but then look who's CIC......................

10 posted on 03/03/2015 7:11:10 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yes we would................

We are used to ‘hand me downs’..............make do with what you have, and if you don’t have it, STEAL IT.......................


11 posted on 03/03/2015 7:12:53 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

" width="500" height="475">


12 posted on 03/03/2015 7:12:59 AM PST by Iron Munro (Mark Steyn: "fundamentally transformed" is a euphemism for "wrecked beyond repair.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

Yea, if the Army were to take them, they would need a lot of money plus several years come up to speed on the maintenance.


13 posted on 03/03/2015 7:13:21 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Improvise, adapt, overcome.
Ooooorah!


14 posted on 03/03/2015 7:16:24 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

if they were being replaced by something like this, i'd be less concerned.

unfortunately, they'd being replaced by whispers and dreams.

15 posted on 03/03/2015 7:17:30 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

As a soetoro appointee, he’s either an outright enemy islamist or a facilitator, so what would you expect him to say?


16 posted on 03/03/2015 7:22:25 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Improvise, adapt, overcome.............AND DON’T GET CAUGHT.................


17 posted on 03/03/2015 7:25:15 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The F-15 and F-16 are not close air support aircraft.There too Damned fast and too delicate for the job.All it would take would be one round from an AK47 and the pilot of either of those planes could be in a cage and on fire.

These appointees are nuts.Espechially this Secretary of the Air Force.


18 posted on 03/03/2015 7:27:02 AM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In the Corps. the Obama administration would be
described as a “Lash-up” organization.
Not a term you want applied to your outfit.


19 posted on 03/03/2015 7:27:41 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Too bad really.

The Army AFAIK has nothing but praise for the ol’ Hog. The close air support that even two or three of these aircraft can provide is unparalleled.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414635/case-warthog-mike-fredenburg


20 posted on 03/03/2015 7:30:03 AM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson