Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, there you have it.

The Emperor has spoken, there will be no debate and SCOTUS better do the "right" thing.

1 posted on 03/02/2015 7:53:40 PM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: PROCON

That’s just 0bama’s way of saying “nice little court ya got there. Be a shame if something happened to it.”


23 posted on 03/02/2015 9:35:51 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

The part that everyone is missing of course(You dummies):

“Republicans say Congress has a ‘Plan B’ but it’s likely the White House would resist it

They would offer consumers temporary financial assistance and give states new permissions to fashion their insurance markets differently”

In other words republicans want to legislate the subsidies back in. Just as I predicted.


24 posted on 03/02/2015 9:51:29 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

I just loathe President Obama.

Among his numerous faults, he’s got the maturity of a 14 year old. The supreme court wouldn’t be taking up this case if there wasn’t a chance there was something wrong with it. This isn’t rocket science. It’s his reality. It’s his job to have a Plan B whether he wants to or not....whether he thinks it’s fair or not.

Basically all of this unconstitutional stuff he’s been doing the last few years has been a good laugh for him...mocking the Congress as ‘obstructionist’ when they call him on it.....all while he’s got the wind of a compliant media at his back.

With all that said, he’s still simply on poor legal footing on a lot of fronts (Obamacare, executive amnesty, IRS scandal). If the legal poop falls on him, like it should if there is a God and a Constitution, I wonder what Obama is going to do? The snark and ‘the blame the GOP for being haters’ routine won’t exactly work for him anymore.

Would he really defy the court like he does the constitution and the congress and just implement his plans anyway? My guess is yes!!! This man loves conflict and is a hater at his core. Nothing would thrill Obama more than being impeached for being in contempt of the Supreme Court.

You can just see he badly wants this conflict...this impeachment... so he can stir the racial, social, and political pot into a sea of protests and violence. It his way...even if not everyone can see that yet. I hope I’m wrong.

In any case, we’re in for an interesting summer because Obama doesn’t follow the law or the rules, but the law and the rules are going to follow him whether he likes it or not. That’s all I can say.


25 posted on 03/02/2015 9:57:04 PM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Well, Hussein Baraka has spoken. Lets fold up our tents and get back on our camels and ride on out of Washington./S


26 posted on 03/03/2015 1:24:48 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

See, guys, I told you: no need for three branches of government.

Dear Reader Knows All.


27 posted on 03/03/2015 2:12:00 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

“Obama says there’s no ‘legal basis’ for the Supreme Court to dismantle Obamacare subsidies”

Sorry people, but PRESIDENT OBAMA IS CORRECT here. The Supreme Court has NO LEGAL BASIS to dismantle subsidies for state-run insurance exchanges...they cannot be dismantled. That was decided in 2012.

Obviously subsidies for federally-run exchanges can be dismantled, since the law never authorized them. That is a no-brainer.


28 posted on 03/03/2015 5:03:40 AM PST by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

The USSC (United Socialists Supreme Court) is complicit in TOTALITARIANCARE. Marxists bickering on the margins ALERT!


29 posted on 03/03/2015 5:04:17 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Obama says there’s no ‘legal basis’ for the Supreme Court to dismantle Obamacare subsidies

Is Obama a Lawyer?? NO
Has he ever been a Licensed Attorney?? NO


30 posted on 03/03/2015 6:53:10 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
It's all about the word "mandatory". Take that word away and what happens?

Take the "type of coverage" mandated by Obamacare away and what happens?

I'll bet 80% or more of those that signed up on the Federal exchange have been getting free healthcare already (Medicaid)and pay nothing.

Then there's employer penalties.

Then there's "30 hours" item.

The whole thing is a farce

32 posted on 03/04/2015 12:20:35 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

The fix is in!!!!


35 posted on 03/31/2015 5:51:42 AM PDT by erod (Chicago Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

There is no legal basis for ObamaCare.


36 posted on 03/31/2015 5:52:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson