I know. You want me to prove a negative - something that you and I both know is going to be impossible to do, and it conveniently sidesteps the issue of the information being presented with the implication that these are full time, permanent jobs working for Apple. And you'll play that game all night.
NO, I want you to show me that they would HAVE jobs absent Apple building. That's a positive. Show that there are jobs out there without Apple. Should be easy. Prove your assertion. Apple showed a positive. Show it is not. You made the assertion they had not created the jobs. The onus is on you.