Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
I know. You want me to prove a negative - something that you and I both know is going to be impossible to do, and it conveniently sidesteps the issue of the information being presented with the implication that these are full time, permanent jobs working for Apple. And you'll play that game all night.

NO, I want you to show me that they would HAVE jobs absent Apple building. That's a positive. Show that there are jobs out there without Apple. Should be easy. Prove your assertion. Apple showed a positive. Show it is not. You made the assertion they had not created the jobs. The onus is on you.

174 posted on 02/14/2015 5:07:34 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
I want you to show me that they would HAVE jobs absent Apple building. That's a positive.

No, you want me to disprove the premise that all of those people would be unemployed if Apple hadn't built that building. You've imagined an alternate timeline, and want me to prove that it could not happen.

182 posted on 02/14/2015 6:38:43 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson