Posted on 02/11/2015 1:45:29 PM PST by servo1969
What is it about the Southern Poverty Law Center that drives leftists to murder?
More information is coming in about the gunman who reportedly murdered three innocent Muslims in North Carolina yesterday, Craig Stephen Hicks.
Hicks is a raging Progressive leftist who fed on a steady diet of liberal media. Then he killed people.
#RuhRoh The guy who murdered innocent #Muslims is a radical athiest fan of #Progressive extremists @Maddow @splcenter http://t.co/iXGVSt1YCR
— Progressives Today (@ProgsToday) February 11, 2015
A review of the Facebook page of the man charged in these murders, Craig Hicks, shows a consistent theme of anti-religion and progressive causes. Included in his many Facebook “likes” are the Huffington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom from Religion Foundation, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” Neil deGrasse Tyson, gay marriage groups, and a host of anti-conservative/Tea Party pages.
Instapundit explains why this story didn’t lead the national news:
IF HE WERE A TEA PARTIER, THIS WOULD BE THE #1 STORY NATIONALLY
This isn’t the first time an extremist progressive fan of the radical SPLC has committed violent acts of terror against religious people. In 2012 Floyd Corkins stormed the Family Research Council headquarters in Washington DC and shot the place up, hoping to kill as many christians as he could.
From FBI interrogation footage. Confessed terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins II, who attacked Family Research Council on August 15, 2012, shooting and injuring Leo Johnson (before Johnson subdued him and took his weapon) explains to FBI interrogators that he used the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list to find his target.
Is it possible Obama and Progressives don’t want to connect Islam to terrorism because they’re afraid of what their radical base will do to innocent Muslims?
You never know with the SPLC. Morris Dees and all....
After the Family Heritage whatever shooting and now this, SPLC needs to be SUED for liability.
It’s always fun to see liberal dirty tricks used against the liberals who do them.
Not to be confused with Morris Day and the Time.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3256478/posts
REALLY!!! I had no idea there were such things as "Innocent Muslims". Learn something new everyday.
Well, this one’s circling the memory hole. Wrong narrative, dontcha know.
Might just be a case of Hitler burning the Reichstag Bldg. gone awry . . .
When will the vicious SPLC spill innocent blood next...?
Let us celebrate non-violence and pray that the venal hate-monger extremists of SPLC soon slakes it’s heavy thirst for anguish, suffering and blooooooood.
Blooooooooood.
bttt
I figured as much, that is why the media dropped the story..they were hoping this guy was a tea partier then they went “Damn, he is a leftist, OK moving on nothing to see here”
Or Otis Day and the Knights?
So this is 2 related to the SPLC and so far still 0 related to the Tea Party....
Yet the Tea Party are considered the violent extremists...
It's the fact that they know they can get away with it, fully backed up by the media.
I don’t know. I read they had a long-standing feud over parking spaces at their apartment building.
I’m not sure how that can be considered islamophobic. Afterall, camels ARE pretty messy.
There’s nothing in America deadlier than an unsupervised, armed democrat.
If there is no evidence indicating they committed acts of violence, nor gave material assistance to those who did, then they are "innocent", regardless of your degree of dislike for Islam.
Rush said today that media was having an orgasm over this when the story first was learned. However, once the media found that the shooter was one of theirs (Leftist, anti-religion, follower of SPLC, Huffington Post etc.),then the story soon has lost momentum and will be a non story by tomorrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.