Posted on 02/09/2015 12:03:45 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
They pulled a 1/2 term, absentee Senator out of nowhere, and he’s a two-termer as President. The Democrats are not going away.
I’m not sure that Hillary! is the inevitable Dim candidate and I’m not sure she’ll even run - she was going to announce in the Spring, and I’ve read recently read that she won’t announce until July (something like time is on her side). While she has and will receive a boatload of money if she runs, I’ve read that Jim Webb is interested. While I would never vote for him, IMHO he might be a more formidable candidate than Hillary.
(The 10th anniversary of what?). (Yawn) My, how time flies. Politico got suckered into sponsoring a cocktail party at the 10th anniversary event marking the (gag) "Clinton Presidential Center."
Opportunistic Billy-boy hoped "stupid Americans" would ignore the details when he pontificated to an appreciative audience during the cocktail hour hosted by POLITICO: "We had 100 times as many people move from poverty into the middle class. This shows the importance of policy."
Pumping 2016 Hillary, he added: "We can do this again.”
OOPS---Billy Boy plumb "forgot" infamous MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber crunched those numbers for the ever-ambitious Clintons....basing the numbers on the Clintons' knee-bending abortion worship. Read on.
=========================================
World Net Daily reported November 14, 2014
BY Jerome R. Corsi / FR Posted by Cincinatus' Wife
NEW YORK – Obamacare architect, Jonathan Gruber, (exposed for his frank admissions that passing Obama's signature legislation required lying to "stupid" Americans)......published a paper during the Clinton administration observing that legalizing abortion saved the government $14B in assistance to economically disadvantaged mothers, including African Americans.....and lowered crime.
MIT economics professor Jonathan Gruber argued in his Clinton paper that without the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, “marginal children” would have been born to many poor mothers. Gruber said statistics show these aborted children would have been 70 percent more likely to live in a single-parent family, 40 percent more likely to live in poverty, 50 percent more likely to receive welfare and 35 percent more likely to die as an infant.
Economist Steven D. Levitt and journalist Stephen J. Dubner in their bestselling 2005 book, “Freakonomics,” relied on MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber’s work to argue that legalizing abortion was responsible for an approximately 50 percent reduction of crime in major urban centers in the early 1990s. more at wnd.com ==
30-second quiz.
q. Who is 2016 candidate Hillary beholden to?
a. QATAR DONOR TO CLINTON FOUNDATION/LIBRARY: The tax-exempt, nonprofit Clinton foundation lists Brunei along with Kuwait, Oman and Qatar as donors that gave the Clintons between $1 million and $5 million (to date).
The Clinton foundation itself confirmed the donations: "The Clinton Foundation's impact would not be possible without the generous support of our donors," the foundation's website reads. "Their contributions have made a difference in the lives of tens of millions across the world." Read more at foxnews.com ...
===========================================
30-second quiz.
q. Who is 2016 candidate Hillary beholden to?
a. w/ a straight face, Hillary recently told Greta the Gitmo Five are NOT a problem to the US. Hillary completely forgot to mention the buddy-buddy Qatar/Clinton connection.
======================================================
30-second quiz.
q. Who is 2016 candidate Hillary beholden to?
a. Clinton donor----Qatar----also facilitates donations to further the beheadings and immolations conducted by ISIS.
==================================================
30-second quiz.
q. Who is 2016 candidate Hillary beholden to?
a. Sharia-loving Emir of Qatar accepted the Gitmo Five terrorists relocated in the Bergdahl swap---living happily ever after in the lap of luxury.
Though the leftist-induced “culture war” ended many years ago, the cunning, ruthless culture warriors survive-—still living on the hefty income they managed to skim off for themselves from their endless govt spending. Hillary Clinton’s 2016 acceptance speech will almost certainly be the last gurgling bubbles of the sinking leftist ship.
So who is 2016 candidate Hillary beholden to? Who is lying in wait for her presidential pen to unleash zillions of tax dollars in interest?
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors
The Clinton Foundation Contributors (partial list of donors):
Donations greater than $25,000,000.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation *
Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada) *
Fred Eychaner *
Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation
UNITAID
* Indicates a contribution was made by this donor in 2013.
Donations of $10,000,001 to $25,000,000
Donor name
AUSAID
Stephen L. Bing
COPRESIDA
Tom Golisano *
Government of Norway
The Hunter Foundation *
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Nationale Postcode Loterij *
Cheryl and Haim Saban & The Saban Family Foundation
The ELMA Foundation
Theodore W. Waitt
* Indicates a contribution was made by this donor in 2013.
Donations of $5,000,001 to $10,000,000
S. Daniel Abraham
Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, Inc. *
Commonwealth of Australia, DIICC *
Elton John AIDS Foundation
Government of the Netherlands *
Irish Aid
John D. Mackay *
The Victor Pinchuk Foundation *
Michael Schumacher
State of Kuwait
The Coca-Cola Company
The Wasserman Foundation *
* Indicates a contribution was made by this donor in 2013.
Donations of $1,000,001. to $5,000,000
100 Women in Hedgefunds
Absolute Return for Kids (ARK)
Jay Alix
Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa *
Alltel Corporation
Nasser Al-Rashid
Anheuser-Busch Foundation
Smith and Elizabeth Bagley *
Mary Bing and Doug Ellis
Richard Blum and Blum Family Foundation *
The Eli & Edythe Broad Foundation
Susie Tompkins Buell Fund of the Marin Community Foundation *
The Sherwood Foundation *
Richard and Jackie Caring *
Gilbert R. Chagoury
Cisco *
Citi Foundation
Clinton Family Foundation and William J. Clinton *
Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund *
Victor P. Dahdaleh & The Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation
Robert Disbrow
Dubai Foundation
Duke Energy Corporation *
Entergy *
Issam M. Fares & The Wedge Foundation
Wallace W. Fowler
Friends of Saudi Arabia
Fundacion Telmex *
Mala Gaonkar Haarman
The James R. Greenbaum, Jr. Family Foundation
ICAP Services North America *
J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation *
Sanela D. Jenkins
Robert L. Johnson *
Walid Juffali
Dave Katragadda
Kessler Family Foundation
Michael and Jena King *
Lukas Lundin
MAC AIDS Fund
Lakshmi N. Mittal
James R. Murdoch
Norad (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation) *
OAS S.A. *
Denis J. O’Brien *
OCP Corporation *
Open Society Institute
PGA Tour, Inc. *
Presidential Inaugural Committee
Princess Diana Memorial Fund
Procter & Gamble *
Stewart Rahr
Paul D. Reynolds
Robertson Foundation
Salida Capital Foundation
Joachim Schoss
Bernard L. Schwartz *
Arnold H. Simon
Bren Simon *
Amar Singh
Carlos Slim Helú & Fundación Carlos Slim *
Michael Smurfit
Steven Spielberg *
State of Qatar
Sterling Stamos Capital Management, LP
The Streisand Foundation *
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
Swedish Postcode Foundation *
Swiss Reinsurance Company *
Nima Taghavi *
The Annenberg Foundation
The Boeing Company *
The ELMA Philanthropies Services (U.S.) Inc.
The Government of Brunei Darussalam
The Howard Gilman Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation *
The Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable & Educational Trust
The Sidney E. Frank Foundation
The Sultanate of Oman
The Swedish Postcode Lottery
The Walmart Foundation
The Zayed Family
Torres-Picón Foundation *
T.G. Holdings
U.S. Green Building Council *
UK Department for International Development (DFID)
Verein Aids Life
The Walton Family Foundation
Gerardo Werthein
Seven more category of donors [drop down lists for each donor group] at Clinton Foundation link.
The likes of Cory Booker will step in. Nature abhors a vacuum.
What did Obama accomplish, before winning the White House twice?
Well...he did defeat the invincible Hillary in the 2008 primary. That counts fer sumptin, don’t it?
“What, exactly, has Hillary every accomplished?”
She is the most brilliant, most accomplished, smartest, most mentally agile, caring, loving, in-tune-with-everything woman who has ever been a co-president, Secrecatry of State, all-around superior intellectual who has ever walked the face of the earth.
/Sarcasm/
IMHO
I don’t know if that should count...but when I read the line “Democrat warrior queen”...I threw up in my mouth a little...
You had no replies to your post. Why is that possible? People deeply afraid of being monitored by the halfies, incoherent elitism or just plain stupidity? There may be other genetic options. Good post, Lake Living.
Re: “What makes you say that Ted Cruz cannot win nationally?”
In Texas, in 2012, Mitt Romney got 100,000 more votes than Cruz.
Romney also beat Cruz by percentage:
Romney: 57.1%
Cruz: 56.4%
Re: “Then you have voters who only vote for Presidential Candidates and leave the rest of the ballot blank.”
That’s why I provided the percentage numbers.
Romney got a higher percentage of Texas presidential voters than Cruz’s percentage of Texas senate voters.
That is meaningful, because there are Democrats, too, who vote just for president and leave the rest of the ballot blank.
By the way, the only Texas exit poll I can find on Cruz’s senate race shows Cruz got just 35% of the Latino vote.
Here’s the link:
Finally, why don’t give me a list of the states that Cruz will win, but Romney lost.
In other words, please show me how Cruz gets to 270 electoral votes.
BTW, what were Reagan’s poll numbers in January 1979 as well? Carter was polling 54% in ‘79. Gee, how did Reagan manage to get the 270 in ‘80, LOL? You are a defeatists of the lowest order who would of justified sucking the Crown in 1774. “We can’t win General Washington, the numbers say so...”
I have a better question.
Could Reagan win California if he ran for president in 2016?
The answer is no.
In the 1980 presidential election, Reagan got just 52.7% of the vote in California.
In 1980, about 20% of California voters were non-white.
In 1980, almost 70% of non-whites voted against Reagan.
In 2016, almost 50% of California voters are non-white.
In 2016, if Reagan won the same racial percentage he won in 1980, he would lose California by at least 5 points.
Re: “You should be glad though, the GOP are winning the war for open Primaries so that limited government candidates will be undermined.”
I have no idea what you are talking about.
I have always supported closed primaries.
The GOP can have closed primaries any time it wants them.
All we need to do is pay for our own primary elections.
Then we can write our own election rules.
Instead, a majority of Republicans, like you, demand that taxpayers pay for our primary elections.
Then you complain because the GOP has to obey state and federal election laws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.