[zeestephen]

Re: “Then you have voters who only vote for Presidential Candidates and leave the rest of the ballot blank.”

That’s why I provided the percentage numbers.

Romney got a higher percentage of Texas presidential voters than Cruz’s percentage of Texas senate voters.

That is meaningful, because there are Democrats, too, who vote just for president and leave the rest of the ballot blank.

By the way, the only Texas exit poll I can find on Cruz’s senate race shows Cruz got just 35% of the Latino vote.

Here’s the link:

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/11/13/1178721/poll-latino-republican-sen-elect-ted-cruz-received-no-boost-from-latinos/

Finally, why don’t give me a list of the states that Cruz will win, but Romney lost.

In other words, please show me how Cruz gets to 270 electoral votes.

[rollo tomasi]

Has there been a Presidential debate yet? Heck, has there been a campaign launched yet? Also your analysis did not address the different dynamics between State/district and Federal at all.

Also, what were Obama's Presidential poll numbers in January 2007?

You should be glad though, the GOP are winning the war for open Primaries so that limited government candidates will be undermined.

[rollo tomasi]

BTW, what were Reagan’s poll numbers in January 1979 as well? Carter was polling 54% in ‘79. Gee, how did Reagan manage to get the 270 in ‘80, LOL? You are a defeatists of the lowest order who would of justified sucking the Crown in 1774. “We can’t win General Washington, the numbers say so...”