Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This article is by Thomas Roemer, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management and the executive director of the MIT Leaders for Global Operations program.
1 posted on 02/07/2015 5:52:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

Made for you.


2 posted on 02/07/2015 5:54:43 PM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

With new technologies we can make stuff cheaper and faster than China if we wanted to. If the government would stop punishing work and investment, we would see a real ‘great leap forward’. (sorry to any commies who feel sore there)

Hopefully we won’t keep giving away domestic jobs to illegals and H1B visa holders.


3 posted on 02/07/2015 5:57:25 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s about darned time, for America to bring back manufacturing.

Last year we set (yet another record) of outsourcing to China. -342,632,500,000.00 Why should we buy stuff from China, and make China stronger and more powerful.

Bring it back. America needs to be stronger and more powerful.

Just saying.


4 posted on 02/07/2015 5:57:58 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would add that “free trade,” which numerous presidents of both parties have advocated, has actually been pretty one-sided. We have actual free trade, whereas most of our trading partners have set up barriers of one sort or another to avoid losing all their manufacturing jobs. The result is that America has been bled more than any other country. And the Chamber of Commerce guys love it.


5 posted on 02/07/2015 5:59:46 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Quality vs Cost fundamentals. If you improve efficiency while maintaining quality, for one thing, on-shoring can be a Very Good move.


7 posted on 02/07/2015 6:00:36 PM PST by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I find it interesting this article, is posted from Forbes, which is after all (to the best of my knowledge anyway...)

Now Chinese.


11 posted on 02/07/2015 6:05:54 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only way to get politicians to take action on bringing manufacturing back to America is to convince them the illegals need the jobs.


14 posted on 02/07/2015 6:11:46 PM PST by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I assume Mr Roemer will shortly be investing his own assets in a manufacturing start-up in the US.


16 posted on 02/07/2015 6:14:25 PM PST by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

More American manufacturing! Yes! This stuff should be built by AMERICAN robots!


17 posted on 02/07/2015 6:16:51 PM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

*


19 posted on 02/07/2015 6:18:29 PM PST by skinkinthegrass ("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Manufactures require workers ...not privileged citizens they are told to hire and can’t fire without political fallout/payoffs etc.


22 posted on 02/07/2015 6:20:11 PM PST by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The dynamic has changed for one reason and that’s fuel cost. It began during the spike in fuel cost immediately after the crash because container shipping got expensive to the point that the challenges of offshoring to China became a questionable trade off. With the advent of the fracking revolution and the associated cheap natural gas, there came a cost advantage to domestic manufacturing. That’s the long and the short of it. If that goes away, then it’s down to labor cost plus transport and China still wins there, not as advantageous as it once was but the numbers still favor.


24 posted on 02/07/2015 6:22:44 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s not going to equate to jobs though. It’ll be automation.


26 posted on 02/07/2015 6:24:41 PM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's Time to Bring Manufacturing Back Home to the U.S.

Yes, I understand there are hundreds of thousands of manufacturing robots looking for work.

34 posted on 02/07/2015 6:44:30 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They don’t mention the fact that China is highly regulated and in some cities you can only certain typed of manufacturing operations in designated zones. This means to manufacture something in China, you may need up to 6 buildings and will have to have the product moved back and forth to create a product. That’s a lot of trucking before even shipping it to the United States with an 8 week lead time.


37 posted on 02/07/2015 6:51:53 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Thank you for referencing that article 2ndDivisionVet. Please bear in mind that the following critiques are directed at the article and not at you.

To begin with, this is another issue where the states can expect the feds to stick their big noses into intrastate manufacturing because of the ill-conceived 17th Amendment imo, corrupt senators helping the corrupt House to make constitutionally indefensible laws that screw things up for USA manufacturers.

In fact, consider that when the country was first established that the rich paid all the federal taxes to keep the feds operating.

The rich alone use imported articles, and on these alone the whole taxes of the General Government are levied [emphasis added]. … Our revenues liberated by the discharge of the public debt, and its surplus applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings.” —Thomas Jefferson to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1811.

I suppose that if I were a corrupt, tax-hungry federal politician that I’d try to think of laws to discourage companies from manufacturing things in the USA so that feds could raise more revenues from imported goods.

Next, while we do need state governments to act responsibly and take care of the environment, it remains that the constitutionally undefined EPA is going look for ways to make it difficult for prospective USA manufacturers to be economically competitive, until company owners wise up to the fact that the EPA has no constitutional teeth to tell anybody to do anything.

In fact, the same thing can be said of intrastate labor. While manufacturers need to work with state lawmakers to make laws to assure workers of reasonable wages and working conditions, how long will it be before patriots wake up constitutionally clueless manufacturers to the idea that the feds have no constitutional power to regulate intrastate wages and intrastate working conditions?

Or is Mr. Roemer possibly anticipating robot-based factories?

So given the unconstitutional federal policy obstacles that prospective new “MADE IN USA” manufacturers will be facing, I’m not sure why Mr. Roemer is seemingly optimistic about it at this point in time, especially since lawless, pro-union Obama is still in the Oval Office.

Otherwise, what am I overlooking?

43 posted on 02/07/2015 7:10:54 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Some one needs to investigate and discuss how much the eco-warriors have contributed to the war on industry, my gut feeling is that it’s a good amount.


44 posted on 02/07/2015 7:11:43 PM PST by jocon307 (Tell it like it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

After the dollar crashes and a Chinese Pez dispenser (and everything else at WalMart and Target) costs $1,200 you can be DAMNED SURE Manufacturing will blaze a flaming trail back to the USA.

It will make Carl Lewis seem like a tortoise.

There will be a tidal wave of on-shoring.


49 posted on 02/07/2015 7:25:27 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanks for the article.

It is not just several good arguments about why manufacturing should come back to the USA from China (reshoring) - it is actually happening.

Investment in new manufacturing capacity in the USA has grown in the last few years, and new money has pretty much stopped going to China. Lower cost producers in Asia have picked off a lot of China’s low-end investment, and the USA is getting some high-end, and some close to the source type of products.

They mention the USA’s cheap energy advantage from fracking, but oil and gas are also feedstock materials themselves for making some products like plastics, fertilizers and a bunch of chemical processes.

The price of oil and gas may fluctuate, but other factors which the article points to will likely increase steadily. Increasing speed in the supply chain and lowering of inventory and transportation costs demands local supply. Increasing automation/robotics will dramatically narrow the labor cost differences, which was the major reason for off-shoring.

Rapid technical innovation is something we excel at, and which the Chinese can pretty much only steal - another reason that companies have been starting to avoid them.

We won’t gain as many jobs, but we will gain some very good ones, a nice shot to GDP and additional tax revenue.

China will be well and truly screwed. The Government there may have to try to convince a hundred million young adults to go back to rice farming or something. They won’t have the big trade surpluses to spend on their military buildup, without printing excess money.

So we are well positioned for an economic boom if a good President comes in next term, and the Republicans hold the Senate (it will be a tough cycle). A few reforms could bring a flood of investment and growth.


50 posted on 02/07/2015 7:32:35 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The United States still manufactures the best guitars in the world. They are very expensive because they take a lot of man hours and man hours in the United States are very costly.

You want to bring back manufacturing into the United States? Then we either lower our wages down to third world rates, or we introduce tariffs.

Either that or just make sure Americans buy American built stuff. We can’t compete with people who make 50 cents an hour when we have to pay them 100 times that.

Are we as Americans willing to pony up the bucks to buy a widget made in America that costs $100 when we can get it from China for $5?


59 posted on 02/07/2015 7:53:57 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson