Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz’s top ten list of Republican goals
The Blaze ^ | Jan. 12, 2015 4:51pm | Pete Kasperowicz

Posted on 02/01/2015 8:19:07 AM PST by SoConPubbie

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Monday outlined a list of 10 major policy goals that the Republican Congress should pursue over the next two years, and said Republicans finally have a chance now to contrast themselves against Democrats.

“Let’s lead with a big, bold positive agenda that says to the American people, you had a referendum and you rejected the Obama agenda,” Cruz told Heritage Action on Monday. “There is a better way.”

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 4.49.28 PM

Cruz said his list may not be possible under President Barack Obama, but warned that failing to try would mean lost elections in the future. “Not only will we not win elections, we’ll get walloped, and we’ll deserve to get walloped,” he said.

Here’s Cruz’s list:

1) “Embrace a big, positive jobs, growth and opportunity agenda.” He said that needs to include not just approval of the Keystone pipeline, but other jobs bills, including easing federal regulations.

2) “We need to do everything humanly possible to repeal Obamacare.”

Cruz said Republicans should send Obama a full repeal bill, but then also send small repeal bills to test Obama’s willingness on health care and draw a distinction between the two parties.

3) “We need to finally secure the border and stop the president’s unconstitutional amnesty.”

4) “We need to hold government accountable, and rein in judicial activism.” Cruz warned that federal judges continue to rule against state marriage laws, when those issues should be left to the states.

5) “It’s time to stop the culture of corruption.” Cruz said quick passage of the $1.1 trillion spending bill last year was an example of both parties failing to govern and failing to give Congress itself a chance to understand what was in the bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: teppe
However, are we being hypocrites after discussing birther issues and wishing for a guy who was born in Canada?

I’m asking sincerely, I love this guy, however, he was born in Canada ..... can or should he be a future president?


So????

Show me in the constitution where being born in another country to a US Citizen disqualifies you for being President?

Please provide the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant sections of U.S. Federal Law that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

You can't because they don't exist anywhere except in your mind/opinion and in sources that are not legal or constitutional in nature.

The Constitution, it's amendments, US Laws, and SCOTUS rulings decide what is constitutional and what is not. Not sources that exist outside that framework like Black's Law or some vague understanding of what it meant to most, but not all, of people alive at that time.
61 posted on 02/01/2015 1:07:32 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marron
Between the two you have two rather fearless and principled men. Walker understands governance; Cruz is a natural leader.

I agree with everything you have stated with the exception of the implication that Ted Cruz does not understand governance.

Ted Understands the Constitution, hence governance, in ways Walker can only hope to.

Ted just comes at it more from a position of principle than Walker, who seems to be moving more and more to pragmatic GOP-E like positions.
62 posted on 02/01/2015 1:10:13 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Cruz is the only way for me, but teaming up with Rand just may get him past Walker/Rubio, neither of whom have military experience or support. Ted and Ron go way back and share the same audit-the-Fed views.

Rand is going to lose POTUS if he runs, AND his Senate seat (can’t be on ballot twice in KY), so he may as well run hard and go for Cruz’ VP. It’ll be strange bedfellows for a while, but I’m willing to do just about anything for a Cruz presidency.


63 posted on 02/01/2015 1:17:55 PM PST by txhurl (RINOs: conservatives aren't electable yet they disguise themselves as conservatives to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I will not be surprised if Rand sits this one out and gets re-elected to his senate seat. He’s young enough to wait 4-8 years.


64 posted on 02/01/2015 1:25:35 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Walker’s own constituency is moving him left. How can he win the nomination when his own state won’t vote for him?

Again, I don’t want a guy zig-zagging to the Presidency, I want a stabber and slasher and destroyer of the enemies of America, whose vision was crystallized years ago.


65 posted on 02/01/2015 1:34:38 PM PST by txhurl (RINOs: conservatives aren't electable yet they disguise themselves as conservatives to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Sadly, even the supposed conservative, grassroots candidate is only against amnesty if it’s done by Obama alone.

I really think that is a complete distortion of the position Cruz has taken on all things related to the border:

EXCLUSIVE – TED CRUZ: HOUSE GOP'S AMNESTY PUSH WILL RUIN HOPES OF RETAKING SENATE

Cruz added that granting amnesty now–while wrong in his opinion at any time–would ensure Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid remains in his position in after the 2014 elections.

66 posted on 02/01/2015 1:36:57 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ez
If we can’t get over this meme that one issue disqualifies a candidate from the nomination

One issue is enough if it is the right issue. Thankfully most of the GOPe have more than one right issue, that disqualifies them.

67 posted on 02/01/2015 1:59:12 PM PST by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. $.98-$.89<$.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/03/scott-walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-increased-immigration/


68 posted on 02/01/2015 2:03:11 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

So did I misunderstand your original post 9YL?

I thought it was referring to Cruz.


69 posted on 02/01/2015 2:08:11 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Oops, sorry—wrong link. I’ll dig out the right one.


70 posted on 02/01/2015 2:08:47 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Here ya go:

http://therightscoop.com/sen-ted-cruz-also-supports-temporary-legalization-status-in-the-immigration-bill/


71 posted on 02/01/2015 2:15:11 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Cruz is AGAINST any illegal getting citizenship. He is for identifying them. That is in the link you posted.


72 posted on 02/01/2015 2:35:07 PM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Yea, I know. This is the one weakness I have found in his policy positions.

Still doesn’t come close the growing list of policy positions that CANNOT be said to be conservative from Walker.

Furthermore, Walker has not defined his position on the rest of the sub-issues of Immigration, and Cruz has, completely and ALL of them are conservative in nature.

Finally, Walker has OPENLY stated his Open-Border mentality.

There is a wide-gulf between Walker and Cruz on this issue.


73 posted on 02/01/2015 2:40:43 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
“It is long past time for us to pass a strong balanced budget amendment,” he said. “What we’re doing to our kids and grandkids right now is, in my view, fundamentally irresponsible.”

Why not just introduce a balanced budget?

74 posted on 02/01/2015 2:44:07 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I’m mildly disappointed that cutting spending and reducing the size of government isn’t in his top ten.


75 posted on 02/01/2015 2:47:23 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

He’s for legalizing them.


76 posted on 02/01/2015 2:56:56 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Oh, Walker is 10 times worse than Cruz on immigration, and he’s probably the guy I support in the race as it looks to be shaping up.

But it’s a shame there’s not a single candidate getting in to fight against amnesty.


77 posted on 02/01/2015 2:58:49 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

How about passing, and signing, a budget and sticking to it?

5% spending cut, across the board, for 4 years in a row.

Bye bye DOEn, DOEd, EPA,

If we aren’t going to secure the border, then bye bye DHS


78 posted on 02/01/2015 3:49:03 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
But it’s a shame there’s not a single candidate getting in to fight against amnesty.

At least no completely, and I agree with you.
79 posted on 02/01/2015 6:42:10 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Ted Cruz is going to have a hard time of it here on FR huh? Says who? You? Dream on.
Reality: I haven’t seen stronger support for any undeclared GOP candidate this early in the election cycle, here on FR for a very long time.


80 posted on 02/01/2015 6:53:40 PM PST by SmokingJoe ( "Ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson