Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigg Red; Gaffer

My understanding, which is very limited, is that the houses stay on the books at the bank near their original value. If the bank sells the house at a huge discount, that loss goes on their books and the banks balance sheets look much worse. ( and who knows if some of these banks would be insolvent if the true value of the house they own were on the books)


74 posted on 01/31/2015 8:03:58 AM PST by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: dynachrome

I believe that when all this happened, these types of loans were bundled into something called “credit derivatives” and sold off (under government guarantee) to investors worldwide.

Taxpayers bailed this out. We increased our national debt because of it, and we have been subjected with 1-2 trillion dollar deficits since then. Obama believes our wealth is limitless and he is trying to redistribute it constantly.


81 posted on 01/31/2015 8:07:05 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red; Gaffer

here is the site I got the link to the article from. Denninger is excellent on the economics of stuff like this. He would like to see “mark to market “, i.e. true market value on houses at any given time nd thsi would be reflected on the balance sheets of banks and mortgage companies.

http://www.market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=229795


84 posted on 01/31/2015 8:08:40 AM PST by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Okay, thanks.


115 posted on 02/01/2015 6:19:47 PM PST by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson