No, you tried to obfuscate the issue by trying to change it from the source of the article to information sourced within the article.
Apparently you think it just fun to waste people's time.
You said it wasn’t sourced from Apple in Post #262, and I pointed out that the links do source it to Apple. It’s no more complicated than that.
The ONLY one obfuscating here is YOU. You are blowing every kind of smoke and mirrors screen you can trying to claim that the figures reported in the article are somehow NOT real, not genuine, and not related to reality and propaganda when they are real, genuine, and completely the reality. YOU, tactialogic refuse to accept the facts and are dancing around trying to redirect everyones' attention to something else, anything else, but the facts. That, friend, is obfuscation of the first order.
NOT ONCE have you started exactly what is untrue in the article. You make innuendo about the article, but you have not once articulated anything about what you find in the article that is "propaganda". You merely declare it is and start screaming and shouting, as if mere volume is sufficient to make it so. Sorry, that does not suffice in polite discourse.