Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troll fest: Obama administration now picking a fight with Republicans over Alaska drilling
Hotair ^ | 01/25/2015 | NOAH ROTHMAN

Posted on 01/25/2015 11:53:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The White House’s Troll Fest, 2015 continues apace.

In fact, if you are getting the impression by now that the Obama administration has no higher priority than provoking fights with Republicans, you’re probably right.

On Sunday, the White House leaked a proposal to The Washington Post in which the administration revealed plans to make the 1.4 million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and parts of the Arctic Ocean off limits to drilling. Some of this can be accomplished via new regulations administered by the Department of the Interior, but not entirely. They have also proposed additional restrictions on oil exploitation in Alaska that will require congressional support. That will spark a fight with Republicans and, specifically, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairwoman Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

While Congress would have to approve any new wilderness designation, Interior will immediately begin managing the iconic area under the highest level of protection the federal government can offer. Democrats and Republicans have fought for 35 years over how to manage ANWR, which boasts significant petroleum reserves but also provides critical habitat for calving caribou, millions of migrating birds, polar bears and other Arctic wildlife.

“What’s coming is a stunning attack on our sovereignty and our ability to develop a strong economy that allows us, our children and our grandchildren to thrive,” said Murkowski, who spoke to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell about the department’s plan during a brief phone call Friday, in a statement. “It’s clear this administration does not care about us, and sees us as nothing but a territory… I cannot understand why this administration is willing to negotiate with Iran, but not Alaska. But we will not be run over like this. We will fight back with every resource at our disposal.”

Alaska Gov. Bill Walker, an independent, said in a statement he may be forced to accelerate oil and gas permitting on state lands to compensate for the new federal restrictions.

There it is. If the White House really hopes to protect the Alaskan wilderness from the effects of drilling, this announcement will have the opposite effect. Of course, Alaska’s wilderness is not the administration’s primary concern.

The most recent polling on the issue – and this White House doesn’t make coffee in the morning without poll testing it – clearly indicates the audience the administration is trying to reach. A poll conducted by Morning Consult in November indicates that 50 percent of the public approves of opening ANWR up to drilling. That includes the vast majority of Republicans and a plurality of independents. Guess which group disapproves of this proposal?

ANWR

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

Shortly after this report was published, the White House pushed out a YouTube video featuring the president waxing gauzy over the pristine Alaska wilderness.

“I’m going to be calling on Congress to make sure that they take it one step further,” Obama said. “Designating it as a wilderness so that make sure that this amazing wonder is preserved for future generations.”

That’s the important part. Any issue that can be used to spark a fight with Republicans in order to create contrasts with Democrats ahead of the 2016 election cycle seems to be on the table for this White House. The 114th Congress will not be restricting future oil exploitation in this massive and virtually uninhabited area of the country anytime soon. This is just another opportunity to mobilize the dispirited liberal base amid a contrived policy fight.

This White House does seem to enjoy substituting provocation and agitation for governance. How else do you interpret Obama’s proposed “free college” plan? It is a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist; federal Pell grants cover access to community college for most low-income students already. Obama’s plan for new student aid, most of which is left to the states to provide, would primarily go to those who can already afford the expense. To pay for this extravagance, Obama proposes to tax 529 savings plans and to punish those families with the foresight to save for their child’s college education. This is obscene. It has no hope of passing Congress, and is designed only to agitate the “soak the rich” liberal base.

How else do you interpret Obama’s plan to force businesses with entry-level employees to offer universal paid leave? “Ironically, right after demanding that businesses add paid sick leave, the president bemoaned falling wages,” Mary Katharine accurately observed. “Again, the more mandates you add, the more potential pay gets funneled to take care of those costs instead of giving them directly to an employee who could then choose to spend them as she pleased.” She further noted that the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that access to paid leave is increasing as individual businesses perform a cost/benefit analysis that only they can accurately execute.

“It’s not exactly that this is a solution looking for a problem, but it’s a ridiculously gigantic and expensive solution to a problem that is increasingly being solved by Americans on their own,” she closed.

This is the president’s approach to governing: Create fissures, sow dissention, pit Americans against one another in the hopes that Democrats ultimately benefit. There is, however, reason for optimism. Despite a scorched earth reelection campaign in which Obama and his allies sought to ignite civil conflict and inspire resentment between minorities and whites, women and men, and old and young, the country stubbornly refuses to tear itself apart.

If anything, this supremely cynical strategy has the potential to backfire. If Obama’s various positioning statements forces Hillary Clinton, or the eventual Democratic nominee, to embrace these liberal wish list proposals, she risks moving too far to the left for the American public. What’s more, after eight long years of conflict, America hungers for a uniting figure – someone Barack Obama promised to be but never was.

While exacerbating divisions in the electorate is a cynical approach to politics, a fair observer must concede that it is also clever one. The trouble for the White House is that it may end up being too clever by half.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 114th; alaska; congress; drilling; energy; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2015 11:53:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Hmmm...can we change the word President in President Obama to either Pretender or Dictator without offending anyone?
2 posted on 01/25/2015 11:57:35 AM PST by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Two more long years of this PO(tu)S.


3 posted on 01/25/2015 12:00:07 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anything that is going to benefit the US he will be against. Anything that benefits radical Islam he will support. Why? Because he himself is a radical Muslim. A radical Islamic agent actually. How many more billion tons of evidence do people need? Does Congress need? Democraps in all their brilliance put the enemy into the nations highest office and during time of war not once, but twice.


4 posted on 01/25/2015 12:01:16 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Obama: 8 acts of blatant treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Troll fest: Obama administration now picking a fight with Republicans over Alaska drilling -— PING!


5 posted on 01/25/2015 12:01:17 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Those are two words I have never used together, and never will.

I have no President at the moment.


6 posted on 01/25/2015 12:01:33 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (You're either in or in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“Designating it as a wilderness so that make sure that this amazing wonder is preserved for future generations.”

Future generations of which 99.999% will never experience first-hand... and maybe only 0.5% via the Discovery Channel.

7 posted on 01/25/2015 12:01:49 PM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to return federal lands to the states, and take the federals out of the loop entirely.

And, we need a renaissance of the tenth amendment.


8 posted on 01/25/2015 12:02:50 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Although “technically” Congress has to approve any changes in land designation, don’t put it past 0 to use the EPA or some other federal agency to change”regulations” so he gets what he wants. The spineless Rs in congress will NOT call him out on it — or if they do, won’t ultimately DO anything about it.


9 posted on 01/25/2015 12:03:24 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mary Katherine link doesn’t work.


10 posted on 01/25/2015 12:05:47 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

11 posted on 01/25/2015 12:09:08 PM PST by JPG (The GOPe will always find a way to surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama is driving the Democratic Party into the ground.

Keep it up Mr. President. And keep dragging the Democratic Party uncontrollably left.

12 posted on 01/25/2015 12:09:34 PM PST by CptnObvious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope he keeps this up. And I hope the GOP House and Senate keep him occupied with his veto pen too.

The more he is forced into public decisions which are counter American interests, the better off the Conservatives will be in 2016.

He is such a loser, such a liar, such an idiot, such a conniver, such a phony, such a racist, such a Muslim!!!

I had to stop for there are too many adjectives in the dictionary to describe this terrible POTUS.


13 posted on 01/25/2015 12:09:52 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama is suffering from great delusions of grandeur. He should spend the next two years traveling the world, enjoy the trappings of royalty and let the Congress run the country. He is an Emperor in his own mind and that of the media, if they have minds.


14 posted on 01/25/2015 12:11:24 PM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
Obama is driving the Democratic Party into the ground.

From mascot to Tar-Baby.

15 posted on 01/25/2015 12:13:44 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

One other thing. I do wish the GOP would adopt one of the tools of the left - never let a crisis go to waste. The next 2 years will be ‘waste’ of time and a risky venture with such an idiot as POTUS, but the GOP needs to utilize every bad decision Obama makes, and every bad utterance he makes as well, every enemy of the US, he embraces, etc.

He needs to be fully exposed for the traitor he is.


16 posted on 01/25/2015 12:14:51 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: econjack
can we change the word President in President Obama to either Pretender or Dictator without offending anyone?

Just change your style book to use the phrase "The current President , Barak Hussein Obama, ..."

17 posted on 01/25/2015 12:15:42 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m beginning to wonder whether we should have an Executive head of government in the form of a President. During the past 20 or so years, we’ve seen mostly bad things from that branch of government.

As a matter of fact, if you look back through the history of the country, beginning with Lincoln, they have done more harm than good, with a few exceptions.

Just thinking out loud here. I’m probably being stupid. I don’t know....


18 posted on 01/25/2015 12:17:55 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

“I’m probably being stupid. I don’t know....”..

You missed a few “good” POTUS along the way but your close.


19 posted on 01/25/2015 12:19:51 PM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe a President should be appointed by a majority of State Legislatures. As they used to do for Senators, but they would together elect a president. Would give them a voice once again.


20 posted on 01/25/2015 12:21:17 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson