Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of Palestinian Centrality
Algemeiner ^ | January 25, 2015 | Yoram Ettinger

Posted on 01/25/2015 7:05:58 AM PST by SJackson

A myth of Palestinian centrality has dominated Western policy, but contrasts with reality, in the Middle East.‎

In 2015, following in the footsteps of Presidents Hosni Mubarak and Anwar Sadat, Egyptian ‎President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi does not subordinate Egypt’s national security ties with Israel to ‎Egypt’s ties with the Palestinians. ‎

El-Sissi — just like his two predecessors — considers the transnational ‎Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian terrorism mutual threats to Israel, Egypt, ‎Jordan, Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf states, which have never regarded the ‎Palestinian issue as a top priority, and have denied the Palestinian Authority their ‎financial generosity. Notwithstanding Palestinian opposition, strategic ‎cooperation between Israel and Egypt, as well as between Israel and Jordan and ‎other moderate Arab regimes, has surged to an unprecedented level. ‎

In 2014, el-Sissi and most pro-US Arab regimes — which have never embraced the ‎myth of Palestinian centrality — supported Israel’s war on Palestinian terrorism in ‎Gaza, which also haunts Egyptian and Jordanian homeland security. ‎

In 1977, Egyptian President Sadat embraced Israeli Prime Minister Begin’s peace ‎initiative, in spite of stormy Palestinian opposition, and in defiance of President Jimmy ‎Carter’s initial objection to direct negotiation between Jerusalem and Cairo. ‎Carter promoted the concept of an international conference, centering on the ‎Palestinian issue, which he assumed was the chief axis of the Arab-Israeli conflict. ‎He pressured Begin to highlight the Palestinian issue, but received no effective ‎support from Sadat.‎

Israel-Arab relations, in general, and the Arab-Israeli conflict, in particular, have ‎never revolved around the Palestinian axis, irrespective of Western conventional ‎wisdom and political correctness, which have been shaped by Arab talk rather ‎than Arab walk, by oversimplification and wishful thinking rather than Middle ‎Eastern reality. ‎

The 1948-49 war was launched by Arab countries, against the newly born Jewish state, at the expense — and not on behalf — of a Palestinian cause, exposing the ‎myth of Palestinian centrality. Thus, Iraq leveraged the war to advance its goal of ‎intra-Arab hegemony and control the oil pipeline from Kirkuk to Haifa; Jordan ‎joined the assault on Israel to expand all the way to the Mediterranean; Egypt was ‎more interested in foiling Jordan’s expansionist plans than the annihilation of the ‎Jewish state; and Syria aspired to advance its vision of Greater Syria. ‎

The 1948 war was not a war of, for, or (mostly) by Palestinian Arabs. According ‎to Professor Efraim Karsh, a leading Middle East expert from London’s Kings College, ‎‎”The 1948 pan-Arab invasion of Israel was a classic scramble for territory and not ‎a battle for Palestinian national rights. As the first secretary-general of the Arab League, Abdul Rahman Azzam, admitted, the goal of Jordan was to swallow up the ‎central hill regions of Palestine. … The Egyptians would get the Negev. The Galilee ‎would go to Syria, except that the coastal part as far as Acre would be added to ‎Lebanon.”‎

Upon the conclusion of the war, Iraq occupied Samaria (the northern West Bank), ‎but transferred the area to Jordan, not to the Palestinian Arabs. Jordan occupied ‎Judea (the southern West Bank) and annexed Judea and Samaria to the East Bank ‎of the Jordan River. Egypt occupied Gaza and did not transfer it to the Palestinian ‎Arabs. Just like Jordan, Egypt prohibited Palestinian national activities and ‎expelled Palestinian activists. In 1959, Egypt and the Arab League dissolved the ‎ineffective provisional Palestinian (“All Palestine”) government, which was ‎established by them in 1949. ‎

The 1956 Sinai war was also not triggered by the Palestinian issue. It was a ‎derivative of Egyptian-sponsored terrorism (activated by Palestinian Arabs in ‎Gaza), aimed at undermining Israel’s sovereignty in the Negev; Egypt’s ‎nationalization of the British and French-owned Suez Canal; and Egypt’s support ‎for anti-French elements in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia.‎

The 1967 Six-Day War erupted as a result of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser’s ‎aggression, aimed at advancing his pan-Arab megalomaniac aspirations, which ‎were unrelated to the Palestinian issue: Egypt’s blockade of oil ‎and commerce to Israel via the Red Sea; Egypt’s violation of the 1957 Sinai Peninsula ‎demilitarization agreement; and the Egypt-Syria-Jordan military pact. ‎

The 1969-70 Egypt-Israel War of Attrition along the Suez Canal took place ‎irrespective of the Palestinian issue. And the 1973 Yom Kippur War (the most recent Arab-‎Israel war) was initiated by Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Iraq, independent of the ‎Palestinian issue.‎

Since 1973, there have been a number of wars between Israel and Palestinian ‎Arabs, but none evolved into an Arab-Israeli war. Arabs have been aware of the ‎subversive/terrorist track record of Palestinian Arabs, and therefore have ‎showered them with rhetoric, not resources, and certainly not on the battlefield.‎

For example, the 1982 Israel war on PLO terrorism in Lebanon was launched on ‎June 5, but the Arab League did not convene until September, following the PLO ‎expulsion from Beirut. The 1987-1992 and the 2000-2003 waves of Palestinian ‎terrorism were quelled by Israel’s defense forces with no Arab intervention, as ‎were Israel’s wars on Palestinian terrorism in Gaza (2008, 2012 and 2014). ‎

Unlike Arab policymakers, Western policymakers and public opinion molders are ‎preoccupied with the Palestinian issue, misperceiving it as the root cause of ‎Middle East turbulence, the crown jewel of Arab policymaking and the crux of ‎the Arab-Israeli conflict. ‎

This Western-formulated myth of Palestinian centrality has led to an ‎oversimplification of Middle East complexities, corrupting Western policy, ‎undermining vital Western interests, exacerbating problems rather than ‎advancing solutions, intensifying terrorism, and diverting attention away from major ‎obstacles to peace, thus creating another major obstacle to peace.


TOPICS: Egypt; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gaza; hamas; iran; israel; jordan; lebanon; muslimbrotherhood; palestinians; saudiarabia; sinai

1 posted on 01/25/2015 7:05:58 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 01/25/2015 7:12:00 AM PST by SJackson (incompetent and feckless..the story of the Obama presidency. No hand on the f***ing tiller, Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
contrast that with this:
3 posted on 01/25/2015 10:15:37 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


4 posted on 01/25/2015 10:24:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson