1 posted on
01/21/2015 9:48:09 PM PST by
harwood
To: harwood
I’m sure the “independent monitor” will be a free thinking, police friendly and strictly objective citizen.
2 posted on
01/21/2015 9:49:35 PM PST by
Tenacious 1
(POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
To: harwood
Undoubtedly the independent monitor will be Al Sharpton.
3 posted on
01/21/2015 9:51:43 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
(Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.a)
To: harwood
Shouldn’t there be someone to monitor the monitor?
4 posted on
01/21/2015 9:52:14 PM PST by
capydick
("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.")
To: harwood
The wrong Cuomo died recently. This guy makes his father look like a priest.
5 posted on
01/21/2015 9:53:27 PM PST by
vette6387
To: harwood
Why would anyone want to go into law enforcement?
6 posted on
01/21/2015 9:56:09 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
To: harwood
The wrong Cuomo died recently. This guy makes his father look like a priest.
7 posted on
01/21/2015 9:56:48 PM PST by
vette6387
To: harwood
I have a suggestion for Cuomo's paid monitor since he likes to keep his friends close : Sheldon Silver .
"Federal authorities are expected to arrest Sheldon Silver, the powerful speaker of the New York State Assembly,
on corruption charges on Thursday,.."
This would be significant as Cuomo cancelled the "Moreland Commission Ethics Investigation" when they got close to his supporters...and Sheldon will need bail money .
To: harwood
How could any policeman of integrity be part of a protection detail for this incredibly bigoted man?
11 posted on
01/21/2015 10:02:48 PM PST by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: harwood
This is flat out unconstitutional. But, who’s going to do anything about it?
To: harwood
And will the monitor do if they don’t like the finding of the grand jury?
13 posted on
01/21/2015 11:31:29 PM PST by
Ray76
(al Qaeda is in the Oval Office (and John Boehner is their craven servant))
To: harwood
14 posted on
01/21/2015 11:32:51 PM PST by
Begin
To: harwood
If the state is going to do that, why not just skip the grand jury process altogether. Why bother with it, if you are going to allow a state appointed individual, to simply decide whether or not a person who has been indicted, should go to trial.
17 posted on
01/22/2015 12:59:47 AM PST by
Banjoguy
(The U.S. government is now a criminal enterprise, at war with the population.)
To: harwood
Gov. Cuomo is assuming a key role in resolving cases where unarmed civilians are killed by police, announcing Wednesday that he will name an “independent monitor” to review grand-jury decisions when cops are not indicted.More government is almost always the Democrat solution.
...And raising taxes to pay for more and bigger government.
Again more style over substance.
18 posted on
01/22/2015 2:46:28 AM PST by
olezip
(Time obliterates the fictions of opinion and confirms the decisions of nature. ~ Cicero)
To: harwood
This comes down to the elites belief that if the people don't vote the right way or the courts make the wrong decision that they have the machinery in place to "Correct" the error.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson