These clowns are wasting time and money. The Constitution DOES NOT “PROTECT” homosexual marriage. It’s not in there. Check it out!
They understand that like a autocratic infallible church/cult, what the liberal elite and their judges decide what the says, or meant to say (being part of a form of tradition), and thus removing the right of states to ban sodomite "marriage" means the Constitution prorects this endangered group.
Freedom not Sodom!
There’s freedom in America, the land of the red white and blue;
but there still must be laws, things you just can’t do.
You can’t marry your sister, your brother, or the family pet;
a sheep, or a goat - at least not yet!
That how is it with homosexuality, what the Bible calls sodomy;
men lying with men as with women, is perversity!
That they’re not designed that way, tis easy to perceive,
but yielding to sinful desires, man is soon deceived.
A moral wrong is not a civil right; like the sin itself, that’s confusion;
calling evil good and exchanging light for darkness, is sure delusion!
History tells us where this will lead, from societies now in dust,
When a nation casts off the laws of God, and follows it’s own lusts.
Promoting a sin which sends one to Hell from an early grave,
dishonors God and robs man of the Life He gave.
There’s but one answer: the Risen Jesus gave Himself for our sins;
Repent and believe, then truly follow Him!
I believe what we're about to experience is something I remember during the Rodney King incident back in 1991.
I remember they showed the Rodney King beating in ultra slow motion and attempted to describe what we were viewing as "he was NOT actually being beaten."
My POINT: The Supreme Court, using a similar tactic, will explain and re-interpret to themselves and the public how certain phrases and sentences of the Constitution, which have NOTHING to do with same sex marriage, are really meant to be directly inclusive of what same sex marriage is all about.
Will we never learn...
""There are those who do not know and do not know that they do not know – they are dangerous and should be shunned. And then there are those who do not know and think they do. They are more dangerous because they are normally politicians and influence the environment in which we live and operate."
It doesn't prohibit homosexual marriage, either. In fact, it makes no reference to marriage at all. So, there is no basis for the Supreme Court to rule one way or the other on this issue.
“It’s not in there. Check it out!”
The ‘right’ to an abortion isn’t in there, either.
But, Hey! 60 million BABIES can’t be wrong - or can they? ;)
It’s a State’s matter. SCOTUS shouldn’t even be involved with this cr@p.
The Constitution is nothing more than something to wipe their asses with. They could care less.