Who has the legal right to redefine the legal meaning of words? And where is the enumerated power for the federal government to redefine words? New dictionaries, assuming they now accommodate ‘trendy’ concepts, do not have the power to redefine legal meanings. Clearly, a matter to be resolved via state legislation with no federal or judicial interference.
Thus, ‘man and wife’. Period. Wife being defined as female. Period. Empirical.
Might as well add this too. The meaning of marriage predates HISTORY itself. It predates the written word. Only a constitutional amendment would change the prehistoric defininition of antiquity and empower federal or judicial meddling. Otherwise, a tyrannical violation of the Constitution that I as a Christian am religiously required to deem an abomination.
But of course justices are educated in opposition to originalism. Only those who see through their professors' BS can shake off that indoctrination.
“Only those who see through their professors’ BS can shake off that indoctrination. “
Judges are being blackmailed and shunned if they don’t vote the way the left wants.
Next will be polygamy to accommodate Muslims and Mormons.