Replies

No, Europe is run by a branch of new world order, the same elites that rule the UK and US.

The elites want their supra-national bodies, mainly the UN with it’s local subsidiaries like the EU, to eclipse national sovereignty in terms of policy-making; of course they’ve also been working on this for a century.

The elites want US citizens disarmed, have been patiently working on this for a century - this is a key part of getting Americans to accept rules set forth by supra-national bodies. Notice how the EU can force its will on European member nations on many issues and the citizens of the various individual nations have no say in the matter.

The elites set up America as a “wild west” of all sorts of freedoms because it allowed them enormous gains in wealth and power - with no income tax. Once the local American elite families were firmly in place, and the elites wanted the US to turn into a superpower and participate in WWI, they instituted the US income tax and central bank.

Nowadays, the program is more to “progress” America towards the elites’ model, the UK and Europe; thus, ending the “wild west” freedoms.

The elites’ conspiracy still needs to be officially “nonsense”, i.e., in the mind of the sheeple it “does not exist” - so the neutering of the American sheeple needs to be brought about by trickery instead of the US government simply announcing that all guns will be confiscated.

The trick being employed is fairly simple, and it was logically possible to start ONLY after the collapse of the Soviet Union:

a) create enemies that attack the American sheeple, and the West in general, ruthlessly and viciously

b) this rationalizes the dramatic buildup of: espionage, military and police/law enforcement in tactics, level of force, actions without just cause or purpose, government spending, equipment used

c) the most significant “enemy” is then transferred from the USSR to “the enemy within”. No neocon could argue in the 1990s that we needed to forget about terrorism and continue spending hundreds of billions to face down the USSR because the USSR stood down, in effect, acknowledging defeat in the “cold war”. This left neocons desperately looking for a new enemy so the US military would not be considered to have “won the cold war” and thus caused its own obsolescence

d) then public discourse / news media / academia / etc is tasked with propagandizing the fallacy that since terrorists have guns, and terrorists are such a “monumental” threat to national security, we need to eliminate all guns from society so terrorists somehow “won’t have access to guns” - and we need to rely on the paramilitary police state to protect us from terrorists - which are much too powerful and adversary for citizens to protect themselves from without the help of the state

e) this trick provides cover for the elites’ government officials to use these illegitimate forces against those who oppose the elites and their programs by simply also labeling THEM as “radical extremists”. The right wing in the US is thus whipped up into a frenzy of support for a “war on terrorism”, providing the underpinnings of public support for not only a still increasing defense and espionage budget and strategic and tactical realignment - but oddly enough they are also supporting the very paramilitary police state that will ultimately be directed against them, the last armed American citizen patriots.

In order to make Islamic terrorism seem to have genuinely originated “spontaneously” and not look like a new world order operation, the terrorism MUST attack various Western countries, not just the US. It can’t be limited to the US in neat little incidents - that would seem too staged. It must really be “unleashed” to do real harm, and very, very few people could be privy to the true instigators. Preferably, those who knew would be part of government intel agencies - thus bound by their oaths regarding “national security”, etc., not to mention an implied threat they would sense regarding any “slip of their tongue”.

The European politicians are little minions of their elite banking backers, the true rulers. The rulers are International - they as a group rule the UK, US AND Europe, as well as the communist bloc (the elites invented and implemented communism as their notion of how to make slave states for those who would accept their “governance”). So the mantra all along as been issued: global trade without regard for national sovereignty is good, immigrants and cultural exchange are good, etc. Politicians that have the blessing of the elites, thus stay in office, are those that can be relied upon to support what they’re told to. Such politicians are very happy to sell out their nation and its citizens just for the thrill of being a “big shot”; that’s why they go along with immigration into their own nation.

The boards of all major defense contractors of the world have for centuries been controlled by the elites. The armaments industry has always been one of their key businesses, that is, it’s like their “stock in trade”, like banking, diplomacy and espionage are. Part of profiting from war is controlling the board of the company that makes the armaments, part is controlling the banking syndicate that arranges the financing for governments to borrow to buy the armaments produced.

I would tend to think that the Iraq area is being planned as a war zone, that the goal is to redraw the national boundaries in that part of the world, creating some new nations that can be more easily “managed” by the financial elites to extract and transfer raw materials. The elites “best friend” (whatever that means in this context) Saudi Arabia is thus bolstering its defenses “just in case war should come to pass”.