[Talisker]

Roe v. Wade itself says that if Congress finds that the unborn baby is “a person within the meaning of the 14th Amendment, appellant’s case collapses.” They have never done it.

And they never will, because they can't. A "person within the meaning of the 14th Amendment" is a natural human being acting in a corporate or governmental capacity. Ever wonder why the court didn't merely say "a person" or "the people"? Because the first would have been challenged and resulted in the exposure of the real meaning of the term, and they have no jurisdiction over the second. A pre-born baby lacks the birth certificate necessary for the government to presume that status was conferred by its parents.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge."
Hosea 4:6

[Arthur McGowan]

A pre-born baby lacks the birth certificate necessary for the government to presume that status was conferred by its parents.

HUH?

I think you have "person" mixed up with "citizen."

A human being is a natural person from the instant of conception. Birth has nothing to do with it.

The Supreme Court GRATUITOUSLY asserted that an unborn baby is not a "person within the meaning of the 14th amendment." They reminded Congress that Congress COULD find the opposite, and that the decision in Roe v. Wade would then collapse.