Posted on 01/09/2015 10:49:45 AM PST by SeekAndFind
It’s not what he’s saying that’s novel — he’s made this point before, and seems to be making it more often lately — but the forum in which he’s saying it. I wonder if there was anyone else featured across the four broadcast networks’ news/current events programming yesterday to raise the point that the “tiny minority of extremists” isn’t so tiny when you consider the raw numbers. Kimmel is uncomfortable from the start, partly because Maher went out there with a point to make rather than engage in the usual dreary late-night banter and partly because he’s violating a liberal taboo in noting that jihadi fanatics are sustained by a larger, decidedly illiberal culture.
Criticizing the tiny minority on TV is okay provided that you emphasize their tiny-minority-ness. When, however, you try to connect up the actions of the worst offenders to the cultural fishbowl they swim in — a practice the left not only engages in but insists upon in every other context except Islamic fanaticism — then you’re over the line. Watch Kimmel scramble for a commercial break as Maher tries to get going on that point. Listen to how silent the audience is throughout, as if they dare not disrespect their host, ABC, by encouraging him. No wonder Maher had to move his own show from broadcast TV to pay cable.
As for his numbers, I can’t find a poll of Muslim opinion that asks directly whether satirists who insult Mohammed deserve death. I can find other polls endorsing draconian penalties for offenses against the faith, though, starting with this one from Pew last year.
That’s not a poll of the total population in each country, merely a poll of those Muslims who believe that sharia should be the law of the land. But that number is itself sizable: Of the 38 countries with large Muslim populations that Pew surveyed, a majority endorsed sharia rule in 25 of them. In 18 of those countries, the majority supporting sharia was 65 percent or more. Clearly you’re talking about many millions of people across many different nations that support capital punishment for apostasy. What sort of bold leap is it to think that there’s widespread, if not majority, support too for the idea that a bunch of infidels who serially mocked Mohammed might have gotten what was coming to them?
Exit question: If the media believes the conventional wisdom it pushes that it’s only a “tiny minority” they need worry about, why are they so afraid to take a risk by publishing cartoons of Mohammed? Strictly speaking, there are a tiny minority of extremists within Christianity, Judaism, and every other faith as well. Take a big enough population and, to a statistical certainty, you’ll stumble across people who are more open to violence when their sacred cows are slaughtered. Yet only one group’s tiny minority so worries the media that they’ll black out key parts of a major international news story to avoid offending it. That is to say, not through its words but through its actions, the media routinely shows that it kinda sorta agrees with Maher about the comparative magnitude of risk. They’re just not as honest about it as he is.
Tell me why are we pi$$ing away our nations treasure and precious lives trying to “Nation Build” in a part of the world that wants nothing else but to destroy us? Could it be because our leaders at present are all Muslims or Muslim sympathizers?
Hollande just addressed nation,, praised police.
-
pretty much has sealed France’s fate with his wimpy performance so far. doesn’t want to rile up a already delicate situation , even tho more conflict likely lies ahead.
Welcome to the 100 year WoT, FRance.
Bookmarked. Thanks for posting.
This “broken clock” is right about the Mohammaden-loving savages.
He deserves credit on this one.
I daresay the only moslems that support the attack are the ones who know about it. There are some in villages in Malaysia or Borneo who haven’t heard and don’tsacclaim it.
I daresay the only moslems that support the attack are the ones who know about it. There are some in villages in Malaysia or Borneo who haven’t heard and don’t acclaim it.
We know Obama is plus most of his appointments are.
He took the mantle from the late Christopher Hitchens.
Defeating Islam is going to take a wide coalition of folks who frankly can’t stand each other, but will have to become temporary allies to defeat this plague.
Note how when enumerating the oppressed that he seeks to help and protect, he left out Christians.
Bill Maher is an equal-opportunity atheist.
He speaks boldly and plainly against all religion.
Other Hollywood liberals attack Christians and Jews because they won’t attack back.
Maher is simply too smarmy to think about his own physical harm.
It isn’t bravery. He’s just a dick.
How about a billion?
Awesome statement. I recall reading about the fall of Constantinople (1453). One reason that great city fell to the muslim Turks is that the Venetians couldn't stand the Greeks, who couldn't stand the Hungarians, who couldn't stand the Byzantines, etc.
So the Europeans squabbled among themselves as the Turks advanced. The West cannot afford a second mistake such as that.
Not really. I can't give credit to a person who gets one thing right while being wrong on so many issues. While he gets the Muslim issue correct he destroys it by painting all religions, and those who believe in them, as stupid.
I suggest that it is both. Maher is not stupid. He's got to realize that he's taking a risk in speaking out. Yet he continues to speak out. He makes me ill most of the time (that's goes to the second part of your description).
But on the topic of islam, he has my admiration, and my deep respect.
Please take a look at posts #12 and #17 on this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.