Posted on 01/07/2015 12:32:44 PM PST by BlatherNaut
Do these fools at the Daily News think that they will be spared? Do they think that if they adopt Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding mockery or criticism of Muhammad, that they will avoid the jihad onslaught? And if they adopt Sharia restrictions on freedom of expression of their own accord, does it even matter if they are spared?
The free press is dying of a self-inflicted wound. Now is the time for every newspaper in the world to republish Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons of Muhammad, in solidarity with the jihad murder victims and as a show of defiance — a signal that we will protect free speech and free societies.
But this will not happen. Instead, watch for more pusillanimity, more temporizing, more denial that this had anything to do with Islam, and more calls for “respect” for “religious sensibilities” — i.e., the placement of Islam in a protected category, above criticism.
God Bless Robert Spencer and keep him safe Lord.
Why Yes. Yes they do.
But Just as Neville Chamberlain learned, if you will not fight them in the Sudentenland, you will have to fight them at the Bulge.
Well old Neville didn't last that long.
Make this 1941 and substitute Japan for Islam and see what would happen ....
From the article at the link.
Do these fools at the Daily News think that they will be spared? Do they think that if they adopt Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding mockery or criticism of Muhammad, that they will avoid the jihad onslaught? And if they adopt Sharia restrictions on freedom of expression of their own accord, does it even matter if they are spared?
The free press is dying of a self-inflicted wound. Now is the time for every newspaper in the world to republish Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons of Muhammad, in solidarity with the jihad murder victims and as a show of defiance — a signal that we will protect free speech and free societies.
But this will not happen. Instead, watch for more pusillanimity, more temporizing, more denial that this had anything to do with Islam, and more calls for “respect” for “religious sensibilities” — i.e., the placement of Islam in a protected category, above criticism.
All the newsies are sufficiently terrorized. This could happen at any time in NYC,especially now that the NYPD has backed off immediately answering calls.
Thank you, Mayor DiBlasioo!
Worse still,the Brits got to fight the Germans at a place called Dunkirk.I bet Neville kept a real low profile after debacle.
Don't expect these newspapers will either once the Islamists get into power.
Q: Why did the Liberal Journalist stand by the Curb?
A: It was trash day.
Normie. Ex Journalist. Trust me on this one.
As I recall Chamberlain became a supporter of Churchill
and did what he could to bolster the war effort...
Not to worry. The New York City newsmen can just exercise their 2nd Amendment Rights and bring their own personal firearms with them to work in their New York City offices and protect themselves.
(oh ... never mind)
Some people should not be protected. Some OTHER people should not endanger themselves to protect muslim enablers either.
I’ve been watching FOX all day long, and you can see the fear in their eyes and in their body language.
Is Bratton ready for this?
OK, they have a legitimate fear of the ragheads, but this is handing them one more victory.
Fourth amendment fell (literally on 9-11-01)—now here comes the First.
Its legit because Govt made it so. As did the media themselves.
No pity for those that enable.
After Hitler’s forces entered Poland that September, Chamberlain officially declared war on Germany; this declaration came shortly after the invasion, but his slight delay in making this announcement negatively impacted Chamberlain’s popularity.
While he saw Britain through the early days of the war, Chamberlain found himself on the political decline. He resigned on May 10, 1940, and was succeeded by Winston Churchill as prime minister. Still Chamberlain remained a member of Churchill’s cabinet. By that October, however, he was too ill with cancer to continue his work. Chamberlain died on November 9, 1940, in Heckfield (near Reading), Hampshire, England.
http://www.biography.com/people/neville-chamberlain-9243721#british-prime-minister
Wikipedia says it was “bowel cancer” — I had thought it was pancreatic. Either way it was apparently quite painful. I believe he realized how profoundly he had failed and that that contributed to his illness.
P****ies
I made a comment in another section that we can rest assured that our MSM lilly-livered spineless MSM minions will not even think of printing that cartoon.
And - of course - the supposition was correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.