Posted on 12/30/2014 7:53:30 AM PST by dennisw
Who do the NYSlimes actually think they are talking for about respect... of all things.
Lmao!
And supports law and order.
This article is the disgraceful part!
The police were right. DeBlasio had already sided with the rabble-rousers and rioters!
De Bl Ass will not apologize.
The new york times is so bad that the birds will not allow their cages to be lined with it anymore. It only makes them sick and they end up crapping alot more.
I remember when dissent was patriotic.
What a pantload.
I disagree.
This editorial reads like an Onion article. I cannot believe they are serious, even remotely.
Wow, just wow. I think the word hate is not appropriate for fellow citizens that think this way, no? Too early? Are we still at dislike?
Respect and admiration?
He said his son was in danger from the coos and backed Al Sharpton during the “we want dead cops” march.
ny times, de blasio, obama = 0 credibility
Blind squirrel, stopped clock.
He’s welcome to his opinion about his son. It might even have some truth to it, in that modern “diversity” culture has made itself into something more rotten than it was before. And it ends up tarring everybody with the same brush.
Their adored Communist thug mayor is suffering in the public eye so the Communists at the New York Times go into overdrive to protect him. So transparent even a low information voter can see it.
The NYTimes has no credibility regarding the NYPD. They’ve spent years viciously attacking the police - all through de Blasio’s mayoral campaign and prior to that. Do they really expect anyone outside their left-wing fringe of supporters to take their pronouncements regarding police seriously?
As for the other, the devil is in the details. Did de Blasio agree with the message (which would be horribly, horribly wrong) or with the mood (which is what sympathetic liberals do)?
To see this issue juxtaposed with his lamentations about his son seems to suggest false representation to me. Someone said that the remarks about his son coaxed on the attack. I fail to see how. They sound like standard liberal oversensitivity to me.
And there are adult ways to deal with this. Descending to the mayor’s childishness makes everyone childish.
I’m probably also going to get the childish antics aimed at me.
They managed to get the officers to act out, which is what liberals eat up.
Not unsympathetic here. It’s difficult not to start acting childish when others who are supposed to be adults act childish.
But giving in turns the place into a kindergarten. Is there room for a Father in Heaven here?
Passive-aggressive contempt and self-pity are two emotions with which Times readers and the Times editorial board are fully acquainted; they are, in fact, relished on an almost daily basis. Along with the horrible prose style.
There are NYPD hats showing up everywhere! Another flat out crock of lies...
The Ramos family knew who the backs were turned to and why. They knew beforehand it would happen I would think. I guessed they would turn their backs if he showed up.
If he had any respect for the police at all he would resign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.