Posted on 12/25/2014 7:02:13 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Edited on 12/25/2014 11:00:00 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The Food and Drug Administration has granted emergency approval for a new diagnostic kit to test blood for the deadly Ebola virus, even as doctors are reporting a survival rate in one hard-hit area that has climbed to about 70 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
PING!
So.... which company makes this new test kit and how much did they donate to the DNC ?
...a new diagnostic kit to test blood for the deadly Ebola virus....
((
Uh-huh, and who is the crony of the Regime who will make big bucks on said kits? Follow the money.
It is unfortunate that it has come to this. Everything that happens is immediately suspect, and for proven past events.
Would you prefer that the usual FDA multi-decade process apply?
Just in case you have not noticed, Ebola is serious and many people will benefit from access to these test kits.
Cutting red tape used to be a conservative virtue, especially in times of crisis.
More”Proof”of the way the seriousness of this Obola Virus thing has been”Underplayed”by the Obongo/Obola Media!!!!!
Your points are well-taken, and it brings me great sorrow to see the state of mistrust that has been brought to us by the behavior of the left. But that is where we are right now.
You are correct on all counts.
It might be even worse if a superfluously trustworthy Right managed to pull allegiance away from God.
Not quite sure what you mean, but my personal religious faith remains solid.
Not a personal criticism, but an overall observation. Even the stoutest bulwark of the world has an achilles heel and clay feet, to shamelessly mix metaphors.
It’s also vain to talk about a “solid” faith because if it isn’t moving, it’s deteriorating. It can’t literally sit like a rock, and in that sense even a biblical metaphor has limits. What would you expect out of a metaphor.
So, because Ebola is the ‘horror du jour’, the process goes out the window?
Is cancer any less serious? Would skipping directly to human trials/market possibly save SOME lives? How many drugs are out, in the world; for YEARS, if not decades, that the FDA claims ‘more testing’ is needed...How many dying would JUMP at the chance for ANY lifeline, but, because of the FDA, perish without the slimmest of chance?!
Abolishing uses to be the (C) answer. Now, it seems that the kinder, gentler Fascism is A.O.K. instead...Next I’ll be reading here will be some “(R)/(C)” rooting for the EPA; ‘they’d’ never lie to us either, eh?
A link to this thread has been posted on the Ebola Surveillance Thread
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.