Cosby won't be charged over molestation claim

Fox News ^ | December 16, 2014 | Associated Press (AP)

[WhiskeyX]

LOS ANGELES – Los Angeles prosecutors on Tuesday declined to file any charges against Bill Cosby after a woman recently claimed the comedian molested her around 1974.

The rejection of a child sexual abuse charge by prosecutors came roughly 10 days after the woman, Judy Huth, met with Los Angeles police detectives for 90 minutes.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office rejected filing a misdemeanor charge of annoying or molesting a child under the age of 18 because the statute of limitations had passed.

[mylife]

Alleged behavior.
PROVE IT

you’ve had 40 farking years!

[mylife]

Gloria Allred is all I need to know.

[ansel12]

At least 14 women had come forward by 2005, who are the 15 who came forward since November, I know about Huth, and Goins this week.

[Kackikat]

The statute of limitation for rape has passed for the women Cosby raped...so no proof needed. The woman only have this time to speak their mind, for no other compensation will probably be theirs.

[mylife]

And seriously girls *old ladies now* do you really think Gloria thinks you have a case? or is she just working your emotions into a frenzy for profit?

[mylife]

Allred is working them like a carnival barker.

[ansel12]

What amazes me is virtually none of the women are claiming rape.

Huh? Lots of them claim that they were raped, that is what 2005 was about.

[mylife]

Are there any actual accusations of rape?

[ansel12]

You think all these gals were running to the PB mansion at age 15 because they were angels?

All these girls? You mean the "one" 15 year old that he took to the Playboy mansion.

[mylife]

I am done with this stupid ****.

Nothing in 40 years.

I smell BS.

Or is Bill some master sexual predator that drugs them tucks them in and touches them?

[Kackikat]

IF they were married to Cosby and the State law allowed it, of course, it would not have been rape...however, that wasn't the case. In criminal activity, the situation as it applies to the law is the basis for a crime or not. ----------------------------------- Article quote... you said was about touching...read these two paragraphs... § 14‑27.7A. Statutory rape or sexual offense of person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old. (a) A defendant is guilty of a Class B1 felony if the defendant engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with another person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old and the defendant is at least six years older than the person, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the person. (b) A defendant is guilty of a Class C felony if the defendant engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with another person who is 13, 14, or 15 years old and the defendant is more than four but less than six years older than the person, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the person. (1995, c. 281, s. 1.) What do I consider sex? What 99% of the nation would agree is sex: AS for your comment on the article I gave you, which quoted the law: What part of the 'vaginal intercourse' did you not understand? Why would you defend a man who has dozens of accusers, who were obviously traumatized....and at the time he was so powerful in Hollywood, no one would have allowed them to suggest he was a 'serial rapist'; which in my mind is what he is based on the details involved.

[Kackikat]

OMG..have you had your head in the sand and not watched any of the interviews of these women, of course there are allegations of rape, dozens of them...many tried to bring it out years ago, but were dismissed.

[mylife]

My point is law was way different back in 74.
Attitudes were different in 74.
I am not saying it is right.

But all those that think these women approaching 70 are little soiled virgins are nuts.

[ansel12]

Nothing in 40 years.

Nothing? The 2004 drugging and rape led to him settling out of court with that victim in 2006, after 13 additional women came forward to testify to him using the same or similar methods on them.

We will also have to see what comes of the claim about 2006.

[mylife]

Why were they dismissed?

Oh.. That’s right,it was BS!

[onedoug]

What she is becomes irrelevant.

I'm sure glad God consults with you in such matters..

[mylife]

He was a fool to settle.
That’s when the wave of BS came.

Gosh I hope that gal got justice with her 200K or what ever.

[mylife]

Next thing I know Miley Cyrus will be claiming Spielberg doinked her at the ET premier.

[mylife]

He was wagging a finger and saying “foam home”

[ansel12]

He was a fool to settle. That’s when the wave of BS came.

So the wave didn't come in November, but in 2006?