Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trent Lott to McConnell: Reverse 'nuclear option'
thehill.com ^ | 12/4/14 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 12/04/2014 1:11:24 PM PST by cotton1706

Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (Miss.) says Senate Republicans should reverse the so-called nuclear option, which Democrats used to reduce the threshold for confirming executive and judicial branch nominees to a simple majority vote.

Lott said incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) should reverse the change of precedent Senate Democrats made last year to defang GOP filibusters against President Obama’s nominees.

Since then, Obama has stocked the federal courts, including the pivotal D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, with his picks. Republicans are split over whether they should keep the precedent in place now that they are poised to take control of the chamber. They will meet on Dec. 9 to discuss their options.

Lott said restoring the minority party’s power to filibuster nominees could help improve the Senate’s bilious atmosphere.

“I would hope that they would reverse the nuclear option. That would be a sign that we’re not going to have things that way,” he said at a breakfast sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. “I think it would help get them off on the right foot.”

Lott said he told McConnell and his staff “that I hope they would do that.”

Under regular order, a rules change requires 67 votes, but outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) circumvented the high hurdle by overturning the ruling of the Senate parliamentarian with a party-line, majority vote.

The tactic is known as the nuclear option because it is seen as antithetical to the Senate’s traditions of operating through consent. Critics say the move severely damaged the fabric of the upper chamber.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Trent Lott seems to have come out of the woodwork with lots of bad (and anti-conservative) advice for Mitch McConnell.
1 posted on 12/04/2014 1:11:24 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Trent Lott. Worthless as warm spit.


2 posted on 12/04/2014 1:12:21 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Trent Lott is an grey, aging, senile vagina.


3 posted on 12/04/2014 1:13:54 PM PST by WMarshal (Free citizen, never a subject or a civilian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It’s a moot point. Repubs will have the majority, so after cloture, the simple majority votes “no”. Might score brownie points for looking civil. two snaps and a circle


4 posted on 12/04/2014 1:14:17 PM PST by VRW Conspirator (Es Mi Partido, Ahora!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Ummmm. No. Now sit down and shut up, Trent.

L


5 posted on 12/04/2014 1:14:41 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Keep the rules as Reid changed it, Obama has his pen and his phone, and the GOP has a nuke to defend against them.

What is good for the Democrat Goose is good the McConnell the Gander, he looks like one.

Reid never brought hundreds of bills GOP wanted for a vote time to make the Dems serve under their rules.


6 posted on 12/04/2014 1:15:25 PM PST by Zenjitsuman (New Boss Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The difference between the Dems and the Repubs is that the Dems know how to play hardball and will. The Repubs think that reversing the filibuster rules is impressive to the voters. Problem is...after they do it, it’s news for a day or two and then forgotten.


7 posted on 12/04/2014 1:16:16 PM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Shut up Lott. You had your chance and you blew it. No one cares about your opinion any longer.


8 posted on 12/04/2014 1:17:08 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Warm spit is useful for spit shining shoes...............


9 posted on 12/04/2014 1:17:29 PM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Civility really worked last time for the Repubs.

Pray America is waking


10 posted on 12/04/2014 1:17:36 PM PST by bray (Palin/Perry 16 two Ps in a pod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
So Democrats get to filibuster, Republicans don't.

Ah! Reminds me of a 1960s Bill Cosby routine. The Revolutionary War rules: British have to wear red coats and march in big columns. Americans get to wear dark clothes and shoot from behind cover.

11 posted on 12/04/2014 1:17:54 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

This is actually a good idea. If the current rules are in place, the liberal judicial and administrative nominations will pass with a coalition of all dems and a few RINO’s like Grahm, McCain, Murkowski, ect. Changing it back to 60 makes sure some conservatives have to be on board with any nomination.


12 posted on 12/04/2014 1:18:04 PM PST by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Quick surrender now before someone asks us to turn their own weapons on them!!


13 posted on 12/04/2014 1:22:25 PM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hey Trent,

14 posted on 12/04/2014 1:24:07 PM PST by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. – Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

Sure has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

15 posted on 12/04/2014 1:24:22 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

And why it trent lott not a senator.....the world wonders


16 posted on 12/04/2014 1:25:41 PM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It is my hope that the new Republican majority will treat the Dems with the same amount of respect that was shown to them since 2009.


17 posted on 12/04/2014 1:26:35 PM PST by a real Sheila (R.I.P AMERICA 1776 - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Trent Lott should go pound sand.


18 posted on 12/04/2014 1:29:21 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All

Trent Lott is an evil, Tea Party hating, hell, CONSERVATIVE-hating SOB!!


19 posted on 12/04/2014 1:29:26 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Keep it as it is, and make it a point to refer to it as the “Harry Reid Rule.”


20 posted on 12/04/2014 1:30:32 PM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson