Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

So what you are saying is that it is impossible for a police officer to use only his arms to cut off the blood flow to a perp’s brain?


54 posted on 12/03/2014 9:40:02 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Hydrazine

I said precisely what I meant to say. The hold used here was not the type that was banned.


68 posted on 12/03/2014 9:51:57 PM PST by DoughtyOne (GOP. GOPe. GOPeGads! GOPeWWWWWWWWWWWWW...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Hydrazine

The first picture shows the rear naked choke, a windpipe choke. Notice the position of the arm behind the head pushing the neck forward into the other arm thus constricting the windpipe. This is not what the cop did.

The second pic shows an anaconda choke, which constricts both arteries to the brain, but does not constrict the windpipe. One of the victim's own arms is used to press one side of his neck, while the forearm of the aggressor is used to press the other side.

In order to achieve the leverage needed to do this, the aggressor must first secure the hold, then rotate his body perpendicular to the victims body. Without that rotation, the hold does not work.

So the officer did not choke him in this manner either.

69 posted on 12/03/2014 9:53:47 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson