Posted on 11/29/2014 3:18:26 PM PST by RummyChick
bttt
Maybe Senior Writer for Newsweek?
http://www.cencom.org/ecom-prodshow/616.html
http://www.jeremymccarter.com/
Good report and comments here on the Chicago Cop Blog:
Side Job Opportunity (UPDATE)
Quiet amusement is the feeling:
New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times so here are their addresses.
GotNews.com strenuously objects to publishing the addresses of individuals who are being targeted with death threats.
GotNews.com published the address of Ebola patient Nina Pham so that people could avoid going to her Dallas apartment.
But it would also be wrong to publish the addresses of journalists without their consent.
Of course, they go on to publish her address prominently on their page. We don’t understand what all the hubbub is about - she and her paper support the rioters and anarchists in Ferguson. Same team and all that. Now of course, she feels threatened:
The New York Times journalist who published Darren Wilsons home address wants police protection and has been calling the police nonstop, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman keeps calling the 020th District station complaining about people harassing and threatening her, our source told us. Shes also complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.
Shouldn’t she be calling 9-1-1 instead of the 020 Desk? We mean, she isn’t special or anything, right? Just a reporter and all that? Police are just citizens - nothing special about a cop either. Absent an actual physical threat, 3-1-1 should be good enough, correct?
Now word comes in via e-mail that she’s looking for a “bodyguard” to save her from all those unwanted pizza and Chinese food deliveries. We would certainly hope that no one on the job would volunteer for this. The irony of this entire situation seems to escape the libs - fuck the police until you need the police.
Thinking about this, it might be a perfect opportunity to explore the ease and simplicity of getting a gun to protect yourself in Rahm’s Chicago. Then we can stop all these pesky murders once and for all committed by legal, law-abiding gun owners.
UPDATE: And the “journalist” has a police record:
The New York Times reporter who published Darren Wilsons address and has been covering Michael Brown has a shoplifting record, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman and her co-author famously published Darren Wilsons address in the New York Times page.
The apparent conflict of interest wasnt disclosed to the New York Times, a source with knowledge in the inside of the Times has told Gotnews.com.
Why, you might ask, is a shoplifting arrest from when she was 17 relevant? Who knows....who cares? Officer Wilson’s home address wasn’t relevant either except to direct criminals to his residence. She failed to disclose a previous bias against the police and then “reported” on an event that affected the police. Sauce, goose, gander.
http://secondcitycop.blogspot.com/
Funny comments at Comment link
Bruce and Janice are 64 and 62, so the age would be about right for her parents.
NYT should care if she falsified her original job application. hmmm.. .. on second thought that might be a positive for the NY Slimes.
bttt
bttt
bttt
bttt
Julie Bosman husband works for Eric Holder DOJ
Julie Bosman, the leftist New York Times hack who published Darren Wilsons address in the Pravada of American apparently has a husband Jeremy L. McCarter who works for the Eric Holder Department of Justice. This makes her posting of Darren Wilsons address that much more curious, or maybe it explains why it happened. This might also explain why Eric Holder wants to jump ship from the Obama regime, before more truths so coming out about his racist agenda.
REPORT: NYT reporter Julie Bosmans husband works for Eric Holders Justice Department
. #Ferguson
The problem is that someone started that rumor and so many people have run with it as if it is true.
So far, no proof that it is true.
I put that up because I saw it “breaking” and hadn’t seen it. I’m watching for follow ups. If Snopes tries to play it down I will assume it’s true.
That got me thinking. Could this be the new trend in communication; news v. rumor and power v. truth? Maybe we've reached the point where anybody can make up anything they want and the story that captures the most viral following first becomes dominant and eventually becomes true or, at least legend.
I'm thinking of the false witness account of Michael Brown holding his hands up and saying "Don't shoot" and the false protestor sign that someone doctored with Photoshop...
Just throw the lie out there and see if it gets traction. The media has become very good at that and now they are getting competition from anyone with a keyboard or cell phone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.