Posted on 11/28/2014 9:20:55 PM PST by Impala64ssa
The New York Times journalist who published Darren Wilson’s home address wants police protection and has been calling the police nonstop, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman “keeps calling the 020th District station complaining about people harassing and threatening her,” our source told us. She’s also “complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.”
Chicago police department sources alerted Gotnews.com about the glaring double standard on Friday.
Gotnews.com published Julie Bosman’s address in Chicago after she published the address of Officer Darren Wilson and his new wife in a widely criticized move.
They don't need to do that. The NYT originally posted the exact address.
And arderkrag supports that.
Wilson.
We are talking about the Nov. 24th story, whizz kid. The day of the riots.
The NYT originally published the exact house number, if the quote from Brother Cracker can be believed: "Under pressure to pull the dangerous content, the Times removed from the reporters’ article a copy of Wilson’s marriage license containing personal information, but left in the street where Wilson owns a home alongside numerous other private citizens that could now be in danger of violence."
A copy of the marriage license, presumably unaltered, was published. Subsequently, and in the face of the outrage you scurrilously claim never existed, they redacted all but the street name.
"Friend of the Left?" Yeah, sure. Nice fallback. Someone disagrees with you, so they must be liberal.
Yep. You might as well embrace it. If you defend abortion, you are a friend of the left. If you defend gun control laws, you are a friend of the left. If you defend the NYT and their utterly hideous endangerment of Officer Wilson, you are a friend of the left.
Enjoy, and I understand MSNBC is a very professionally-rendered opinion channel.
Any decent person knows that nobody needs to sink to that level. The only reason that was done was for revenge.
We all know that the dirtbags that lowered themselves to this level will never take any responsibility for their actions.
Revenge is a loser for all parties.
And, lest we forget, arderkrag supports them and defends them.
The address on the marriage license isn’t theirs. It’s the address of a law firm.
Interesting, though not surprising, that now you resort to lying outright.
From the actual story web page, linked at http://www.nytimes.com/news/ferguson/2014/11/24/quiet-wedding-for-darren-wilson-police-officer-in-ferguson-shooting/
Editors' Note: November 25, 2014
An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed.
I know. It was the officers credit card numbers. No no no, it was the name of the dog and the canary Officer Wilson owns. Wait, wait, it was the cable TV account number.
You are adopting ALL of the traits of the left, now to include lying.
Quit arguing something that is not relevant to this case. There is no honorable reason for knowing the street that Wilson lives on any more than we need to know what street Brown lived on.
The only reason to do this is the hope that some kook will burn his house down or kill him and his wife.
Grow the damn hell up!
Because the NYT would DEFINITELY pull the certificate image for THAT!
LOL
Dude is spinning worse than Jay Carney.
arguing with idiots is not a productive use of your time. They’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
or Josh Earnest!
Despicable!
Yes, but some of us LIKE wrestling with pigs to teach them to sing. :)
Your confirmation bias is staggering. You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger. Is this what you truly believe?
” You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger. Is this what you truly believe?”
It’s what I believe. This is the NYT after all.
If arderkrag was merely trolling us, I could forgive that. Enjoy it, even. However, if he was for realz, he deserves fire and spikes and lye.
Glad you finally admitted it.
Your willful obtuseness is what is staggering here.
The NYT published the Marriage Certificate. They subsequently removed the image, with the statement: "Editors' Note: November 25, 2014 An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed." They then went on to defend retaining only the street name in the story itself. If you cannot put the pieces together, you are acting in an enabling, collusive manner with the NYT. We, who actually THINK out here, are not fooled.
You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger.
Finally, we appear to be getting somewhere.
Took him forever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.