[arderkrag]

Your confirmation bias is staggering. You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger. Is this what you truly believe?

[Lurker]

” You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger. Is this what you truly believe?”

It’s what I believe. This is the NYT after all.

[Sirius Lee]

You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger.

Glad you finally admitted it.

[Lazamataz]

Your confirmation bias is staggering. You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger. Is this what you truly believe?

Your willful obtuseness is what is staggering here.

The NYT published the Marriage Certificate. They subsequently removed the image, with the statement: "Editors' Note: November 25, 2014 An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed." They then went on to defend retaining only the street name in the story itself. If you cannot put the pieces together, you are acting in an enabling, collusive manner with the NYT. We, who actually THINK out here, are not fooled.

You know what, fine, the press went ridiculously out of its way to put a cop in danger.

Finally, we appear to be getting somewhere.

[Lazamataz]

YOU AHOLE. I just dug up the Freeper email message (on another topic) where you admitted trolling me and someone else. THATS what you are doing. LOL you pr*ck, I gotta make sure to log your name in my head so I don't get taken in again.

[Brother Cracker]

Here’s an example of the crap spawned by the Times article.

https://twitter.com/darrenwilsonstl