BREAKING: COPS: NYT Reporter Who Published #DarrenWilson Address Calling Cops Nonstop

Got News ^ | 1/28/14

[Impala64ssa]

The New York Times journalist who published Darren Wilson’s home address wants police protection and has been calling the police nonstop, Gotnews.com has learned.

Julie Bosman “keeps calling the 020th District station complaining about people harassing and threatening her,” our source told us. She’s also “complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.”

Chicago police department sources alerted Gotnews.com about the glaring double standard on Friday.

Gotnews.com published Julie Bosman’s address in Chicago after she published the address of Officer Darren Wilson and his new wife in a widely criticized move.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

She made her bed...

[moovova]

...but they did not publish the full address..

"What difference, at this point, does it make?"

[moovova]

“It’s rumored that she has somewhat atoned for printing Officer Wilson’s home address by opening her home to him and his family as a ‘safe-house.’ “

I’m betting she asked him (and his fellow officer wife) to bring their weapons...especially since the local cops have put her at the bottom of their priority list.

[DaveA37]

“..........Suddenly what she did to Officer Warren”.......

I believe that would be “Officer Wilson”.

[hal ogen]

What a self-righteous pig of a “journalist”. That she would endanger a policeman and his family is beyond disgusting. One can only hope that Justice finds her. Being fired should be the first repercussion for her act.

[Ghost of SVR4]

Even with the internet and all the technology today, it’s still almost impossible to get a person’s cell phone number.

I have to disagree with you. MANY people put there cell phones on facebook, linkedin, a plethora of sites. Its not hard to correlate this info.

[sport]

Hopefully it is true.

[Karl Spooner]

The address was never posted by the Times. People really are gullible.

.

Fox News report on New York Times

[04-Bravo]

I blame the NYT editors as much as the author. There must have been several layers of editorial approval before that article went to print.

It wasn’t an accident. The NYT times published those personal details because they wanted to.

[arderkrag]

Naming the street is not publishing an address. They are two vastly different things. Also, they haven’t lived at the listed address for quite some time. If the reporter had actually wanted to cause harm, she would have used the current address.

[txhurl]

Maybe she didn’t have the current address and was ‘fishin’ around for someone to give it to her.

Who did that journolist who leased a house right next to Sarah to harass her work for?

[txhurl]

And she uses her nasty little RAT teeth to gnaw up her nasty little RAT fingernails. I sense Daddy issues.

[Brother Cracker]

[onyx]

Suck it up, Buttercup!

[Karl Spooner]

The Times thought they had the right house. Which makes it worse yet because someone else could be living there. Also, since they did list the street, there is a AFP photo showing the house and the mailbox with the street address on it. Without the street, it would have been more difficult to find.

[Impala64ssa]

The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; .....Read more at http://www.snopes.com...
This came from Snopes?!?Anything from Snopes you really need to take not with a grain of salt, but the entire salt mine! CONSIDER THE SOURCE.

[Lazamataz]

The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; moreover, that information was neither current nor revelatory in nature since (as noted in the same article) the Wilsons had vacated the house months earlier, and that same information had already been widely disseminated back in August 2014 in coverage of the Mike Brown case published major newspapers such as the Washington Post and the Boston Globe Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/wilsontimes.asp#yr3UHJAlo7OfJd43.99

This defies even the most lightly-applied level of logic.

What is the newsworthiness of publishing even the street name of the Wilsons?

Further, what is the newsworthiness of publishing the street from which they vacated?

Finally, what is happening to you? You seem to be drifting to the Dark Side.

[Lazamataz]

Naming the street is not publishing an address. They are two vastly different things. Also, they haven’t lived at the listed address for quite some time. If the reporter had actually wanted to cause harm, she would have used the current address.

Besides, those damned Jews had it coming to them, dominating every level of business and banking like they did. Bringing them to a concentration camp doesn't actually cause them harm.

WTF is going on with you?

[Darksheare]

Bump and ping.