[Lazamataz]

Naming the street is not publishing an address. They are two vastly different things. Also, they haven’t lived at the listed address for quite some time. If the reporter had actually wanted to cause harm, she would have used the current address.

Besides, those damned Jews had it coming to them, dominating every level of business and banking like they did. Bringing them to a concentration camp doesn't actually cause them harm.

WTF is going on with you?

[arderkrag]

I find it highly suspect that people are crying foul now and not when the information was originally published in August. If it was really such a horrible thing, where was the outrage then? The Times publishes an old address, and suddenly people go apoplectic? I no longer understand.