Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Navy Vet's Case For Gun Control
Daily Beast ^ | 11.23.14 | Shawn VanDiver

Posted on 11/23/2014 7:19:19 AM PST by Second Amendment First

How many shootings will it take before we adopt common sense gun control? A former Navy weapons instructor lays out the simple steps lawmakers can take to make us all safer.

Last week, there was yet another campus shooting. This time, it was at Florida State University. The exhaustingly predictable cycle of mass shooting, recycled talking points from all sides, proposed legislation, insider lobbying, stagnation, and loss of public interest is about to begin and has been repeated far too many times in recent memory. Face it: the gun rights debate in this country is stale. In May, I talked about how both sides are wrong and said that we need to have some common sense. Today, I am calling on lawmakers to have some damn courage.

If you feel, like the fringe gun lobby does, that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want, then say that. Don't hide behind meaningless rhetoric or claim you're ready for action only to back off when the NRA comes knocking. That being said, if you believe—along with a clear majority of Americans of both parties—that modest regulation of weapons designed for the sole purpose of killing humans seems reasonable, that's a pretty easy public position to take.

And before you jump to assumptions, know that I'm no hippie. As a former weapons instructor in the U.S. Navy, I own guns myself—and I want to keep them. However, I believe that our society is overflowing with lethal weapons and that we must take action to prevent more dead kids. Mass shootings are on the rise. Children are dying. When will it be enough to actually do something? Who has the courage to do the right thing—money from special interest groups be damned?

If you feel, like the fringe gun lobby does, that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want, then say that. I'll make it easy for lawmakers. Here is the first common sense step for what we need to do, at the state level, to maintain our constitutional right to bear arms while arming ourselves with the tools to be safer in public.

Licensing, to be renewed every five years with full background checks and mental health screenings, is the first step. Adding a checkbox to a driver's license and another form would make this easy to implement. My driver's license tells folks that I am a donor; it could very easily also indicate whether or not I am a gun owner or authorized to carry concealed firearms.

Before you tell me how I am violating your rights by proposing a record of gun owners, note that the constitution does not say that you have the right to bear arms and not tell anyone. We regulate chemicals, elevators, airplanes, and financial transactions—and none of those are specifically designed to kill anyone.

The next step is requiring 40 hours of training prior to license approval. I’m here to tell you that there is little value to having a firearm if one is cannot employ it tactically. I’m not saying we need owners to be trained to the level of Navy SEALs or SWAT teams, but if you claim to want these weapons to protect your home, then you should at least have a baseline knowledge. The training hours should jump to 80 hours for a concealed carry permit. This training should be done by the government to ensure consistency and quality control and should be covered by the tax on ammunition.

And finally, to pay for the licensing process and training as well as the background and mental health screenings, we can add a modest tax to ammunition sales (think five to ten cents per round—a manageable amount). This way, the costs are spread amongst those who wish to own guns.

My hometown city charter calls out public safety as the number one priority; many politicians around the country say the same thing, and I'd like to see them put their money where their mouths are. The question is pretty simple: do your lawmakers have the courage to protect you?

Call your state senators, your assembly members, your mayors, and your city councils. Tell them that you want to protect your kids. You want to protect your communities. Hell, you want to protect yourself. Tell them that, with the stroke of a pen, they can improve safety for their constituents and side with the clear majority of Americans.

And if they try to run you around or brush you off, remember to ask them if they think the right to own as many firearms as one wants without anyone else knowing about it is more important than the lives of America's children—including yours and theirs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2014 7:19:19 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want, then say that.

False choice.

This liberal bozo needs to shut up and read the Constitution.

/johnny

2 posted on 11/23/2014 7:21:41 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Tokenism alive and well at the Daily Therion, because all vets are the same, right libs?


3 posted on 11/23/2014 7:22:17 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubh_Ghlase

Here’s a man after your own heart.


4 posted on 11/23/2014 7:22:34 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

A former Vietnam Vet sez, “Stick this were the sun don’t shine, REMF.”


5 posted on 11/23/2014 7:23:57 AM PST by Seruzawa (Gully Foyle is my name, and Terra is my nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First; null and void

Talk about a false comparison! So if I want to own a gun, which is my right, then I don’t care about his six year old son.

Isn’t this called a straw man argument or is it false dichotomy or non sequitor?

I can never remember. I have to call my best friend and ask him (every time)


6 posted on 11/23/2014 7:24:13 AM PST by Shimmer1 (Conservative. Because we can't all be on welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
If you feel, like the fringe gun lobby does, that my 6 year-old son's life is less important than your right to own whatever firearm and ammunition you want, then say that.

If you prefer, like the gun grabber lobby does, lying about what R2KBA-ers like us believe rather to having an honest debate, then say that.

Oh, wait: you just did.

7 posted on 11/23/2014 7:24:20 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Wow, this guy thinks he’s such an expert on everyone else’s rights!!!!


8 posted on 11/23/2014 7:24:52 AM PST by Shimmer1 (Conservative. Because we can't all be on welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

There are several logical phallus-ies from this dick.


9 posted on 11/23/2014 7:24:59 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Just because he was a Navy weapons instructor does not give him any special insight into freedom, liberty, or our Constitution. I wonder if he has ever read any history books?


10 posted on 11/23/2014 7:25:01 AM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

No, thanks. You can monitor and take care of your own property as you see fit. So will all the other gun owners.


11 posted on 11/23/2014 7:26:44 AM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
logical phallus-ies

I love it!

12 posted on 11/23/2014 7:27:09 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Which Navy vet was this, John Kerry or Jimmuh Carter?


13 posted on 11/23/2014 7:27:22 AM PST by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

hahahahahaha, you know, you’re right!


14 posted on 11/23/2014 7:27:26 AM PST by Shimmer1 (Conservative. Because we can't all be on welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“Mein Volk, Es fur der Kinder!”


15 posted on 11/23/2014 7:28:00 AM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
An Army Vet's case for gun control: Go to the range more.

5.56mm

16 posted on 11/23/2014 7:28:56 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Before we enact gun control, let’s run a little experiment with the navy vet. I want navy vet to live in the following inner cities for one month each w/o a gun: Detroit, South-side Chicago, Camden, NJ, South central LA, East St. Louis, East side Cleveland. He can spend his first month in and around Ferguson, MO.


17 posted on 11/23/2014 7:29:33 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. President zero gave us patient zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I don't need a license or a background check to worship as I choose...or to refrain from worshiping,for that matter.I don't need a license to invoke,or refrain from invoking,my 5th Amendment rights regarding self incrimination.Yet I need a license *and* a background check....
18 posted on 11/23/2014 7:30:11 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Jimmy Carter;No Longer The Worst President In My Lifetime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Maybe this idiot would approve of the rest of us knowing how it is raising their kids so they don’t become a Harris and Kleibold.


19 posted on 11/23/2014 7:31:04 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

From the comments there:

Before 9/11 the largest mass murder in New York State was the at Happy Lands social club in the Bronx. Seventy eight people were murdered with two gallons of gasoline. Should we have a waiting period to purchase gas containers, or back ground checks?

I checked and the murderer there is up for parole next March.


20 posted on 11/23/2014 7:32:41 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson