...sigh...I “used” to like Dana...
Will the Bush people ever, ever just go away??
Then what does she make of the 25 or so times Obama is on record saying he doesn’t have the authority to do what he just did?
Dana, you ignorant slut.
She’s on the Jeb bandwagon, what did you expect?
No its RINO nonsense. RINO is just polite name for dem-lite...
In addition to the cute sycophant Perino, it was hilarious watching tubby Karl Rove on Fox the other day trying to convince even Bill Oreally that Amnesty would be a great thing.
O’Really wasn’t biting. Said the border should be militarized.
Rove’s face was ashen. He couldn’t believe that not everyone agrees with his Patron’s view of mass illegal immigration. He was squealing so fast and high pitched, it was comical: Porky Pig tries to convince the Wolf not to eat him.
The Bushes are WASPs who failed. Their time came and went, they were never able to get anything going except through crony crap. Couldn’t do banks, couldn’t do oil...so they could do government. Pretend to be the Defenders of the Faith, when all they are is opportunists, and bad ones at that.
They decided to assimilate to the Mexican Borg a long time ago. Just get used to it and fit in...that’s their message.
Perino is just a puppet. Too much of a Good Girl to push back.
This is lunacy. If a President can use the sham of “prosecutorial discretion” to just disregard enforcing whatever laws he chooses as a matter of polilcy then how can anyone expect Congress to compromise on anything. They will know that whatever they receive in exchange for their concessions will not be enforced by the President so they get nothing back as a result of the “compromise.” Would Ms. Perinno agree that a President can use prosecutorial discretion to disregard the civil rights act?
I saw her say this yesterday. She’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
—yes—maybe she should think about this—
She makes me sick with her sycophantic statism. I’ve stopped watching The Five on Fox mostly because of her. Her constant defense of Big Government and Bush hero worship is vomit-inducing.
She’s a spokeshole and from what I remember when I watched the show is that she swings center right to left. I looked at her schooling and I see neither a Constitutional law background or any law degree at all, so she is just speaking out of her anal sphincter.
How the *&^ can anyone sit there with a straight face and make this claim?
Nothing but a cross-eyes space alien looking sycophant.
Governors have executive authority as well.
There are soon to be thirty-five Republican governors.
Republican governors should exercise Prosecutorial Discretion and simply ignore Obama’s executive order.
Lawsuits have no impact against the lawless.
Governors have executive authority as well.
There are soon to be thirty-five Republican governors.
Republican governors should exercise Prosecutorial Discretion and simply ignore Obama’s executive order.
Lawsuits have no impact against the lawless.
I truly despise that bimbo. She has the thought process of a gnat.
This is why, regardless of the damage done, it was good Romney didn’t win.
RINOs and D’s want the same thing. It’s no mistake that W considers Clinton a brother from another mother.
That makes sense to me.
Dana Perino is not a legal scholar. Andrew McCarthy, on the other hand, is not only a prominent legal scholar but also a former prosecutor. Here is his learned opinion:
‘’He [Obama} is claiming not only the power to determine what immigration laws get enforced and which illegal immigrants get prosecuted — power he unquestionably has. He also claims the power to declare (a) that criminal acts are somehow lawful — that illegal aliens now have a right to be here — just because Obama has chosen not to prosecute them; and (b) that those who engage in this unprosecuted activity will be rewarded with benefits (lawful presence, relief from deportation, work permits, etc.), as if their illegal acts were valuable community service.
‘’That is an utter perversion of prosecutorial discretion and a blatant usurpation of congressional power. Only Congress has the power to repeal criminal laws and confer positive legal benefits on non-Americans.’’
Dana Perino’s non-expert opinion on prosecutorial discretion has as much value to her listeners as her non-expert opinion on brain-surgery procedures. None. If she wants to pontificate on the latest issues without knowing what she’s talking about, she’d be better off appearing on ‘’The View’’ where no one takes the panelists’ opinions seriously rather than holding forth on a serious news network.