If this policy is a good idea, then why does it only apply to college students, instead of applying to everyone? The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone.
1 posted on
11/20/2014 9:47:28 PM PST by
grundle
To: grundle
Lmao!
The sexual revolution is undone not by morals but by PC.
I’d like to see 14 day waiting period followed by notarized consent forms.
2 posted on
11/20/2014 9:50:45 PM PST by
NoLibZone
(I voted for Mitt. The lesser of 2 evils religious argument put a black nationalist in the W.H.)
To: grundle
4 posted on
11/20/2014 10:11:30 PM PST by
BBell
(I'm cynical and sarcastic and therefore I love Ann Coulter)
To: grundle
6 posted on
11/20/2014 10:27:11 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: grundle; sickoflibs; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; Impy; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj
I should probably read the full article, but how exactly does this law work? Does the woman have to yell “f— me!” to her partner in front on a witness? Does she sign a “Declaration of Intent to have Sexual Intercourse” form before sleeping with the guy? Seriously.
9 posted on
11/20/2014 11:41:59 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Thanks to RINOs, Illinois has definitely become a "red state" -- we are run by Communists!)
To: grundle
It’s meaningless in any case. Questions will come down to he-said/she-said on whether there was a verbal “yes” instead of the old he-said/she-said.
12 posted on
11/21/2014 4:40:54 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: grundle
Um...that was kinda the _point_ of getting a marriage license: legal acknowledgement of accepting the consequences of the act.
19 posted on
11/21/2014 8:27:49 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(You know what, just do it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson