Posted on 11/20/2014 11:53:25 AM PST by Jim Robinson
Zot bait.
Here's a good start from operationamericanspring.org
Bkmk
Non-violent protest, if anything as such could ever get off the ground, will not help as long as a man such an BHO is the president. He. does. not. care. If the congress proves impotent, we are between a rock and a really hard place.
What I gave was the law...nothing less and nothing more. So if you want to promote lawlessness, go ahead, it makes you on the same level as Zero.
Note to Harry J. Gruber: "SO WAS THIS."
What the Republican takeover looked like midnight 11/5---
<> Alaska went Republican; on Dec 6 so will LA. <>Democrats
who ran ON amnesty were soundly defeated. <>Of 140 Southern
state legislative districts, 110 went Republican. <>Texas is
redder than ever. <>Illiois has a Repub governor.
Midterm Map courtesy of http://www.nationaljournal.com
Amen.
In no way did I promote lawlessness and how dare you say I’m on the same level as Obama. What I meant, and thought was clear, is that I don’t believe it matters how much protesting occurs because he obviously doesn’t care what the majority of the people want. He thinks he knows best. If he has the mindset most of us think he does, inferred from his many words and deeds over the years, the voice of the people will simply bring out long, pretty speeches on how we are wrong, misguided, and he knows best.
And by the way, While saying that I don’t believe protests will sway the president I do feel that with enough people at the LOCAL/STATE levels appealing to their representatives, which are much more beholden to their constituents by the mere fact that they are in the communities and have to deal with the day to day interaction, phone calls and lobbying, this is where I think change could come from. In other words...putting pressure on our GOP reps to heed our cries.
But what do I know I’m just a working-class (young) grandmother.
Mr. Robinson,
Am with you 1000% !
Ping to this article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3229482/posts?page=1#1
Boehner said some pretty strong words; folks need to keep calling him and his colleagues and tell them:
IMPEACH THE 0!
Boehner disagrees with you.
See this part of his comments on the 0 amnesty speech:
“.... President Obama has cemented his legacy of lawlessness and squandered what little credibility he had left.
His ‘my way or the highway’ approach makes it harder to build the trust with the American people that is necessary to get things done on behalf of the country.
Republicans are left with the serious responsibility of upholding our oath of office.
We will not shrink from this duty,because our allegiance lies with the American people.
We will listen to them,work with our members,and protect the Constitution.”
These points he made do NOT involve funding 0’s lawlessness!!!!
“Uphold our oath”
“Our allegiance lies with the American people”
“... protect the constitution “
They DO point to action entirely the opposite of ‘funding’!
Aren’t write-ins and lobbying in the non violent protest category? We can call and write our Representatives and Sentators as a group and make more impact than as individual.
You know plenty....it’s grandmothers who make the difference, if the truth were known. WE pray, we instruct, we model the right behavior.
Yes, they are but we’ve called, faxed and E-mailed on various issues over the years and with the crop of reps we’ve had it doesn’t seem to do any lasting good. What I’m talking about is more conservatives should have been allying with and growing the Tea party or another similar vocal group. Problem is, they can’t seem to get off the ground in such a seemingly liberal, progressive society as we seem to be now. Hopefully things might change for the better and the downward spiral stop with the Republicans gaining seats.
Even though that is true, our only legal resource is as we discussed.
Have a good day.
The legal beagles I've read so far say that only means federal appeals courts and district courts to relieve the burden of the Scotus.
However, if one simply reads the text literally, there is no mention of what kind or court, what it's to focus on, and how it's to be convened.
My understanding is that there is currently a law in place that specifies, and without doubt, that illegals cannot receive the benefits that the president is conferring upon them. We need to find that law.
It is not 'prosecutorial discretion' to directly countermand and existing law and order something that is specifically declared illegal to do.
I’m in....what do we need to do?
Apparently the Democrat-Socialists didn’t get the message of the last election. Or, perhaps, elections don’t really matter anymore. We the People don’t matter anymore.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
