David Brooks: Its Palin spasm over, GOP is a responsible party again

The Fresno Bee ^ | November 9, 2014 | David Brooks, New York Times columnist

[zeugma]

Sarah lives rent-free in the liberal mind. It’s pretty funny.

[SarahPalinForPresident2012]

I can’t wait for Gov Palin to take oath as POTUS on Jan 20, 2017

[GOPJ]

Why would I ever care what David Brooks feels about anything... Stupid ...

[kiryandil]

And why did she endorse a Democrat in Alaska?

And a GREAT BIG good morning to you, too, bigPalintrolldaddy!!!

[onyx]

B T T T ! ! ! ©

[bigdaddy45]

I’m sorry, did I say something incorrect? Did Mrs. Palin NOT endorse a Democrat? Against a Republican? Please enlighten me.

[Elsie]

Damned with faint praise comes to mind...

[kiryandil]

It's been noticed that you're always on any Palin thread like a fly on Obama. LOL! :)

BTW - nobody cares what "Uncle David" thinks about Sarah Palin - nor does anyone care what your trolliness thinks about Palin. LOL! :)

[x]

If she's so "over, washed-up, irrelevant, ditzy, stupid" and all that, why is this faux conservative and the rest of the media still talking about her and trying to convince us of the above?

It gets people to read the article.

Sure it might have been a better article without the snarky title, but a lot less people would mouse-click it.

Brooks's response to your question, though, might be that there are a lot of people who arouse public interest but who aren't likely to have successful political careers.

[bigdaddy45]

Well fortunately I have enough of a life such that I don’t track the posting habits of others. But if thats how you care to spend your time... have at it.

[2ndDivisionVet]

She’s held four or five elected offices, how many has avid Brooks held?

[kiryandil]

FReepers are always interested in the doings of trolls like yourself. LOL! :)

[bigdaddy45]

Yes, because if one is not TOTALLY supportive of Mrs. Palin, then one must be a troll. Your logical abilities are indeed stunning.

[kiryandil]

Yes, because if one is not TOTALLY supportive of Mrs. Palin, then one must be a troll. Your logical abilities are indeed stunning.

Haters gonna hate. One of us got a degree based on our logical abilities, and it ain't YOU, Palintroll.

[Elsie]

Well fortunately I have enough of a life such that I don’t track the posting habits of others.

I hope this lack-of-habit does NOT extend to politicians; or you'll think what they NOW say is what they THEN said.

NEVER knowing what they've told in the past makes it REAL hard to see if they are flip-flopping now..

[hrh40]

Hey, bigdaddy45, to answer your obnoxious, trolling question:

Palin endorsed a Democrat/Libertarian ticket in Alaska because that ticket is more interested in upholding the Alaska constitution than the R ticket was.

In case you haven’t been paying attention, oh, for the last 10 years or so, the GOP in AK is desperately corrupt and the very definition of crony capitalists with Big Energy companies.

Do some homework and you’d know why Palin endorsed Walker.

[TBP]

Sarah Palin scares the heck out of Dhimmicraps because they know she’s a much more serious figure than anyone in their party.

[TBP]

It’s time to stop taking David Brooks seriously.