Posted on 10/29/2014 9:10:49 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
An Orbital Sciences rocket operating under a NASA contract exploded shortly after launch on Tuesday evening, much to everyone's surprise except, perhaps, Elon Musk.
Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, trashed Orbital Sciences for using outdated Russian engines during a 2012 Wired interview:
"One of our competitors, Orbital Sciences, has a contract to resupply the International Space Station, and their rocket honestly sounds like the punch line to a joke. It uses Russian rocket engines that were made in the 60s. I dont mean their design is from the 60sI mean they start with engines that were literally made in the 60s and, like, packed away in Siberia somewhere."
Two years later, Musk tweeted his condolences about the explosion, in which no one was injured:
"Sorry to hear about the @OrbitalSciences launch. Hope they recover soon."
The Antares rocket was carrying a Cygnus spacecraft that was supposed to deliver supplies to the International Space Station on a routine mission. The exact cause of the explosion is still unknown. However, the Orbital Sciences team wasn't tracking any issues prior to launch. The private space company says it will conduct a thorough investigation starting immediately
SpaceX has a similar contract with NASA to supply cargo to the space station.
Thanks JH.
The irony of our comments, and SpaceShipTwo’s ‘incident’ was lost on me until just now
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/31/spaceshiptwo-flew-on-untested-rocket-motor.html
I hate to burst your bubble (well maybe “hate” is a strong word), but SpaceX has basically already done it. Check out this link that logi_cal869 posted from space.com of an article published in August. Here is an excerpt:
“The most recent reusability test, which occurred last month during a launch for commercial-satellite firm Orbcomm, was also a success, SpaceX representatives said. Indeed, SpaceX released a video captured by a camera on the Falcon 9 first stage that shows its measured descent and controlled entry into the Atlantic Ocean.”
In other words, they made a soft landing into the ocean. This shows that they have everything in place, and for their December launch they will be doing a soft landing on a platform in the Atlantic. It seems silly to say that they should “just forget about the new liquid-fueled system” since they showed back in July that it does virtually everything they want it to do from start to finish.
This is what I was talking about:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3199395/posts?page=15#15
Here’s more about the SpaceX Falcon9:
SpaceX Rocket Prototype Explodes In Texas; Rockets Are Tricky, Musk Says
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3196099/posts
and more about SpaceX’ participation in a Boeing project:
NASA awards space taxi contract to Boeing and SpaceX
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3204692/posts
and more about pork-barrels:
Three Congressmen Are Using Red Tape to Bind SpaceX to Earth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3191941/posts
a couple more sidebars:
Airframe Structure for First Commercial Dream Chaser Spacecraft Unveiled
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3191191/posts
‘Pumpkin’ Moonship for Private Manned Lunar Landings Passes Key Review
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3019874/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.