Skip to comments.
The Establishment Almost Had Me
freedomoutpost.com ^
| 10/24/14
Posted on 10/24/2014 3:14:51 PM PDT by cotton1706
Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter almost had me convinced the other night. They almost had me. I think even Mark Levin hinted at it.
Elect Republicans, any republican, to stop Obama's agenda and get rid of Harry Reid.
Ann Coulter was so animated over it that I thought she was going to melt down. She was visibly and mockingly furious with anyone stupid enough not to vote for those like Mitch McConnell, or her love, as she describes him, Scott Brown. All the republicans she is pushing are Chamber of Commerce, big government hacks.
Anyway, this seems to be the refrain from the right, not just from the establishment, but also from conservatives. We must halt the Obama surge and throw out Harry Reid, so let's hold our collective noses once again and pull the lever.
And then what? And then no one has an answer because there is no answer, and they will not allow that question to be asked.
So, I guess I'll ask it again. And then what? Republicans take control of the House and Senate and then what?
Let me also answer that. Nothing gets done. At least nothing we want. Nothing gets slowed down or stalled. Nothing gets repealed. And why? Well, they already have a built in excuse for that. Now they need the presidency in 2016 to really get things done.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-170 next last
To: frog in a pot
Generally, not if one remains objective, truly has a desire to make the best decision and focuses on the word, "lesser".
In the case at hand, given the current politics the moral differences are quite obvious.
Let me give you the most glaring example that proves you wrong:
Mitt Romney
1. Supports Abortion
2. Supports the Gay Agenda, including Gays in the Boy Scouts and Military, Gay Adoption, and single-handedly implemented Gay Marriage in MA.
3. Supports Amnesty
4. Supports Socialized Medicine
5. Supported Global Warming scam.
You are exhibiting the problem with reacting out of fear and Political Party tribal politics.
You lose your objectivity.
81
posted on
10/24/2014 4:19:29 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: roamer_1
Who cares about the grass? My point is that it is the same damn road.
That sounds really deep but you realize we wouldn’t have Obamacare if the republicans had had control of the house and senate? I can offer several other examples but I won’t.
82
posted on
10/24/2014 4:21:32 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: boycott; roamer_1
That sounds really deep but you realize we wouldnt have Obamacare if the republicans had had control of the house and senate? I can offer several other examples but I wont.
You do realize that even when they had the opportunity to stop Obamacare dead in it's tracks by defunding it, they chose not to, right?
83
posted on
10/24/2014 4:24:01 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Lumper20
If you dont vote then unless its Independent you do not vote often.I refuse to cast vote for someone who doesn't share my same values because they use my vote as justification for their agenda.
84
posted on
10/24/2014 4:24:04 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
To: C. Edmund Wright
but the vast majority from Democrats.With complicity of the GOP.
85
posted on
10/24/2014 4:26:11 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
To: frog in a pot
You are looking at the word, “Lesser,” from the stand point of doing less legislative damage. I would agree. With a Replican Senate we will get nothing for two years, which technically is better. But do the Republicans do less damage to the conservative cause when they stand on the floor of the Senate and call their base Hobbits? Do they do less damage when they ridicule their base for expecting them to repeal Obamacare? Do they do less damage when they go in front of a crowd, and lampoon conservatives in the house? If I had more time I could come up with many more examples of Republicans destroying the conservative brand. Just how are we supposed to convince voters that conservatives have a better plan to run the country when our own leadership ridicules us?
86
posted on
10/24/2014 4:28:09 PM PDT
by
Yogafist
To: boycott
That sounds really deep but you realize we wouldnt have Obamacare if the republicans had had control of the house and senate? Bullcrap. It might have been called Romney-Care instead, but not a dimes worth of difference. If you are right, then I expect when the Pubbies return to power, that Obama-Care will be immediately voted into the dustbin of history... But I won't be holding my breath.
87
posted on
10/24/2014 4:28:48 PM PDT
by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
To: Yogafist
I am pretty sure getting hit by a car is better than getting hit by a bus, but just because I chose not to get hit by the car doesnt mean I have chosen to get hit by the bus. Such an argument reminds me of the "3 guys go to a motel...what happened to the other dollar" form of argument.
For your argument to apply to federal elections, I submit it would be more accurate to view the issue as "your future and that of your family depends on you crossing a busy freeway at a certain point in time although you get the choice of traffic, a line of autos or a line of buses".
You get the last word, but have a nice evening.
88
posted on
10/24/2014 4:29:19 PM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(We are all in the same pot.)
To: JSDude1
Exactly! And for the time being democrats are far worse than rino’s (same animal )...get behind Cruz and keep your powder dry, I do see lead flying if the muzzie in chief tries this amnesty bullshit...remember the old story of “what difference does one gun make”....lot’s of applications for that tale.
89
posted on
10/24/2014 4:31:38 PM PDT
by
mythenjoseph
(Separation of powers)
To: SoConPubbie
So I should just give up and surrender like you apparently have??
90
posted on
10/24/2014 4:32:09 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: cotton1706
I know what the Democrats will do. I don’t know what the Republicans will do.
We’ve stopped them before. We’ll have to stop them again.
91
posted on
10/24/2014 4:33:35 PM PDT
by
jch10
(WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM THE COYOTE IN CHIEF?)
To: JSDude1
So I should just give up and surrender like you apparently have??
If you want to give up moving conservatives forward, go ahead.
I've not yet begun to fight to make sure the GOP-E is defeated and conservatives are victorious!
92
posted on
10/24/2014 4:35:06 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Great! But you don’t do that by letting COMMIE-Dems become elected to the US Senate, when you could have stopped it!
93
posted on
10/24/2014 4:35:55 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: SoConPubbie; JSDude1
94
posted on
10/24/2014 4:37:25 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: roamer_1
It might have been called Romney-Care instead, but not a dimes worth of difference
That is clearly wrong.
95
posted on
10/24/2014 4:37:45 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: JSDude1
Great! But you dont do that by letting COMMIE-Dems become elected to the US Senate, when you could have stopped it!
And you don't do it by voting for those in the GOP-E who do not share your values and have taken what amounts to a blood-oath to see you and your principles defeated.
96
posted on
10/24/2014 4:38:28 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
You do realize that even when they had the opportunity to stop Obamacare dead in it’s tracks by defunding it, they chose not to, right?
You do realize that there were a lot of other extenuating circumstances, right? If not, you’re not being honest.
97
posted on
10/24/2014 4:39:49 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
I wonder how Harriet Miers would have voted?
98
posted on
10/24/2014 4:40:23 PM PDT
by
jch10
(WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM THE COYOTE IN CHIEF?)
To: C. Edmund Wright
This ain’t the nation you seem to think it is. When they said Romney was our LAST CHANCE I believed them. Personally I think mcCain was our last chance, such s it was.
99
posted on
10/24/2014 4:41:55 PM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: boycott
You do realize that there were a lot of other extenuating circumstances, right? If not, youre not being honest.
Same deceitful excuse given every time the GOP refuses to stand on principle.
100
posted on
10/24/2014 4:42:00 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-170 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson