[SoConPubbie]

Generally, not if one remains objective, truly has a desire to make the best decision and focuses on the word, "lesser".

In the case at hand, given the current politics the moral differences are quite obvious.

Let me give you the most glaring example that proves you wrong:

Mitt Romney

1. Supports Abortion
2. Supports the Gay Agenda, including Gays in the Boy Scouts and Military, Gay Adoption, and single-handedly implemented Gay Marriage in MA.
3. Supports Amnesty
4. Supports Socialized Medicine
5. Supported Global Warming scam.

You are exhibiting the problem with reacting out of fear and Political Party tribal politics.

You lose your objectivity.

[frog in a pot]

Let me give you the most glaring example that proves you wrong...
You are exhibiting the problem with reacting out of fear...
You lose your objectivity.

Despite your kind words, you are still missing the point, pal.

In short, I think the difference between us is that I would rather try to persuade someone like Romney to lead in a manner that best serves the population, than try to persuade someone like O to do likewise.

On the other hand, it appears that you are with the group that would assume the fetal position when it was time to take action.