[lbryce]

Come on. Do you know any gays that would prefer massages as first choice and other acts of gay gratification second? Of course not! It's not that gays shouldn't serve in the military because they'd be getting massages all day, it's because they'd be looking for other soldiers to engage in acts of gay physical gratification all day.

[cripplecreek]

Duncan Hunter Sr always pointed to problems with unit cohesion if gays openly served.

[Responsibility2nd]

God Bless Louie Gohmert.

He pisses off the liberals like no other.

[Missouri gal]

Bad for unit cohesion. Or just say bad for morale. Then you don't have to argue about the high rate of gay-related problems, like psychologically unstable (5 times higher), more prone to criminal behavior like stealing (again, about a 5-fold higher incidence among gays), treason (a la Bradley Manning), violent behavior, including especially rape.

[rrrod]

LOL attaboy!

[SkyDancer]

[bassmaner]

The GOP has no one to blame but themselves for the repeal of DADT. It could have been stopped in the 2010 lame duck if the usual-suspect RINOs had voted the right way.

The use of the military for social experimentation starting in the 1990s with the Tailhook so-called 'scandal' and the establishment of DACOWITS has got to be one of the most pernicious acts ever committed against this country by the Left. Regardless of whatever one may personally believe about the rights of women and gays, there's simply no excuse for sacrificing unit cohesion and readiness on the altar of political correctness.

My worry is that the next shoe to drop will be dumbing-down of standards for special forces such as the Seals and the Rangers. The GOP absolutely needs to do everything possible to prevent that from happening and not knuckle under to p.c., regardless of the political fallout.

[ZULU]

Totally agree with Gohmert. He is a Great American.

[duffee]

Gohmert for Speaker of the House.

[kidd]

There are reports that sexual assault is way way up in the military since the DADT was eliminated. Gohmert could have made a better point with these facts. I understand what he’s trying to say (and he is trying to keep it clean), and it is a valid point. But without backing, he’s just setting himself up for ridicule by the liberal MSM.

[Yollopoliuhqui]

Gays have unregulated sexual impulses. It come with the territory. That’s why it’s a sickness- it’s unregulated. The topic of gay recruitment is rarely broached meaningfully, analytically, but it’s a continuing attack upon lost youth who may be frustrated and looking for validation or a surrogate authority with a regimen of values. Gays are a political ploy by globalist oligarch factions to weaken a nation’s ability to react to violence in a fight fire with fire manner. The oligarchy feeds on weakness and encourages its growth in ways the conservatives have not quite yet sussed. So much of conservative ethos is defensive, not a good strategic position. The compensation is to bully rather than to trounce intellectually. Not smart.

[clintonh8r]

I love Louie! (but not in a gay way)

[vpintheak]

No no no. They would be humping each other all day long. It’s all about the sex, any port in a storm.