Because Biden’s kid is a DemOCrat and the “Media” are DemOCrats.
Besides uncle Joe’s son, his daughter has been caught on film snorting cocaine, and his niece has been in and out of rehab several times.
That’s already much more than the Palin’s can claim - and not a peep from the MSM.
Fyi.
Because with the Bidens there is nothing to lie about or sensationalize. They are up front criminal, liars, unfit for public or private service. What you see is what you get and what you get is expected of democrats and nothing they do or say surprises anyone. Biden outrageous criminality = democrat norms.
Do you think Bristol or Willow are going to settle down and get married anytime soon? I wonder. Too much fire there.
I couldn’t read much of that pile of excrement, but the headline seems accurate
Our differences are irreconcilable.
The Palin’s are survivalist’s from a part of our Nation where daily living can be more like survival. Life is different in Alaska. More like it was as this country experienced it’s historical trek to modern times. The Palin’s are do’ers if there is such a word. Git ‘er done’ers.
I admire that.
At times it’s a rough, and tumble existence up there that some staff writer at National Review might have a problem understanding the basics that produce the results.
Funny, I consider a day on which Charles W. Cook (whoever the Hell he is) is silent to be a good day for America.
What a flaming hypocrite HE is! He gets his bona fides by bashing Palin and then tries to get brownie points by bashing his fellow Palin bashers.
A Bookmark Ping to Sarah's Awesome List!
This is a good "Who's Who's" of Palin Haters on both the left and the right.
“As should now be clear to all who follow my work, I do not like Sarah Palin. I never have.”
This guy would be part of the reason I don’t follow National Review as I once did.
He does finally get around to two good points. If any other woman was assaulted, would we focus on her bad language or on the guy who assaulted her?
And even he only manages to look at Hunter Biden first tying him to the Palins. Actually, he’s late on that one, since Bristol herself already made that point.
Hunter’s business dealings, which are inextricably tied to his dad’s, reek of corruption. He is a millionaire from selling access to his dad, and it is fairly obvious he is a millionaire as a proxy for his dad. Where are the “journalists”, including at National Review, who are prepared to dig into his finances?
Malkin made a good start, but there is more.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3218013/posts
Biden’s son is one of ‘them’ and Sarah Palin is one of ‘us’.............................
The purpose of the media is not inform the citizenry of current events so they can be informed participants of the Republic.The purpose of the media is to guide the thoughts and emotions of the masses.It is vital that the party and state have the monopoly on all sources of information. This is necessary in order to direct the masses to serve the party and state effectively.Those who support the party and state are to upheld as possessing the highest virtue and values.Anyone opposing the party and state are to be portrayed as either evil capitalists plundering the workers or to be held up to ridicule as foolish impediments to the advance of the progressive march to the socialist utopia.
Sorry, the author’s first comments lost me. He maybe sitting in on “The View” next.
What the heck is going on in this article? I just read Bristol’s account on FB this morning and it was nothing like this excerpt from Andrew Sullivan’s blog. She said nothing about wearing a “thong dress,” she did not say she was dragged anywhere (she was pushed to the ground) and she only quoted one “F” word.
What am I not getting?
Yet at the same time he is pointing out the disparate treatment, he spares no ink on trashing Sarah and the family along the way. And, FWIW, excepting one f-bomb, those words weren’t Bristol’s, they were the words of her attacker: Ray Rice plus the profanity.
Bidens son doesn’t have a reality show, appear on TV shows, and doesn’t get into nasty divorces. Palins need to go away.
“All in all, I can think of few people in public life who have been as disgracefully hounded as has Palin;”
Isn’t that the truth! Why? It all started with that witch Katie Couric and went downhill from there.
You didn’t like her, Charles? At all? Even right after she was nominated? Seriously? There’s admitting against interest, and then there’s telling people you’re a clueless fool. And Andrew, if the prospect of Sarah Palin being president, or one heartbeat away from it, still disturbs you more than the reality of the two incumbent arseclowns, just shhhhh, okay? (And blogging the voices inside your head without checking the facts they’re telling you is still not journalism.)