Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney leading the 2016 field

washingtonexaminer ^ | Published October 19, 2014 | Kelly Cohen

[BenLurkin]

Hillary Clinton remains the clear frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in 2016, while Mitt Romney barely leads against a scattered group of Republicans.

Among registered voters, former Secretary of State Clinton leads the potential 2016 Democratic field, with 64 percent of the vote. She has a sizable lead on Vice President Joe Biden (13 percent) and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren (11 percent), according to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Exactly what are you butting about with your buts?

[HiTech RedNeck]

However, the psalm that states that the earth is the Lord’s was written WELL after the fall. You are going to have to try harder to calumny the Lord.

[iowacornman]

I will go fish. No Romney. He is a Rino— not a conservative. He will never win my state. 6 million of us stayed home— It will go to 10 million. He is a Morman and we dont do Mormans— absolutely get him off the stage. He blew his shot real bad. NOT AGAIN!!

[Innovative]

” I believe Ted Cruz will be the nominee and even if Hillary runs .. she can never outrun Ted “

This is the same wishful thinking where many kept hoping that Sarah Palin will run for president and refused to support any viable Republican candidate and we ended up with Obama.

Might as well get ready for Hillary with this same kind of thinking...

[Innovative]

Romney is not going to run, and he’s not going to be the GOP’s presidential nominee ever again.”

I totally agree.

[Blue Highway]

I thought the head of that clan GOP_LADY was banned so there should be no more Romeny cheerleaders right?

[svcw]

Ok, that’s funny

[DoughtyOne]

Get ready for president Clinton then...

This guy couldn’t even best Obola.

[blackdog]

I'm not endorsing the idea, merely explaining the interpersonal dynamics behind his relationship with the widely stupid and theater driven electorate.

Endorsing Romney is like saying "We're sorry, and we need to make it right", but the public doesn't want to do the heavy lifting of finding a new guy when Romney will do.

[C. Edmund Wright]

the point is, it’s the voters, period - not some back room filled with smoke in a DC warehouse.....

[blackdog]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3217236/posts

Right on cue.

[franzpick]

My choice for 2016 is a 100% favorite: LEAVE THE COUNTRY

[Diogenesis]

The Bishop RomneyCARE and Rove will DECREASE
the voting in two weeks .... as is their plan.

[SoConPubbie]

Romney is the most outwardly presidential politician in front of a camera. Americans miss someone presidential. Even the hood rats have had their belly full of a community activist in chief as their president.

So, when did it become "Presidential" to support the following?

1. Abortion
2. Gay Agenda
3. Global Warming
4. Amnesty
5. Socialized Medicine.

[Windflier]

a poll at this juncture is LESS THAN MEANINGLESS - and yep, it’s a Freep orgy of bitterness and despair.

Dead on the money, C.E.

The whole point of this article is to divide and demoralize conservatives.

[SoConPubbie]

This is the same wishful thinking where many kept hoping that Sarah Palin will run for president and refused to support any viable Republican candidate and we ended up with Obama.

Might as well get ready for Hillary with this same kind of thinking...

Right on cue, our resident GOP-E Booster, Innovative, comes along and tells us we have to settle for someone like Romney, anybody but a conservative.

If this was 1979, he'd be saying the same thing about Reagan.

I wonder how much the GOP-E is paying him to come here to spew this garbage.

He/she/it is truly the chaff among the wheat.

[C. Edmund Wright]

The whole point of this article is to divide and demoralize conservatives.

So was anyone else smart enough to figure that out?

[C. Edmund Wright]

so not Romney and not Cruz.

Who then?

[blackdog]

Since we had citizens who think it is.

Are we trying to change our politicians instead of changing our convictions to be something better? (and I am referring to the masses)

Politicians only tap into what they think the people want.

[SoConPubbie]

Politicians only tap into what they think the people want.

You forgot those with money that will do everything in their power to game the system to their advantage like the GOP-E and the Chamber of Commerce.

That is the main reason we got Romney.

There was 100 million+ of eligible voters WHO DID NOT VOTE in 2008 and 2012.

The choices they had in both election for POTUS were miserable.

In 2012 especially, it was almost a distinction without difference.

You put up a REAL Republican(Which Romney was not), better yet, a conservative, and watch what happens.