Posted on 10/18/2014 4:47:41 PM PDT by Kaslin
How much is too much of a burden when it comes to being an American?
As Americans, we’re required to engage with our government at all levels, in all sorts of ways. Many of those ways create burdens, but are part of the deal when we live under the rule of law and decide who represents us in government. Our relationship with our government is a two-way street.
Consider some of the pillars of civic duty – voting, jury duty, registering for Selective Service, participating in the Census, challenging a property tax assessment. All of these carry burdens on us to leave our homes, bring our stuff, travel to government offices, and spend time filling out documents.
A federal judge in Texas last week ruled that requiring citizens to show a valid photo ID was too much of a burden. The Supreme Court likewise ruled on similar photo ID requirements in Wisconsin, but not on the full merits.
To be fair, there’s more to the Texas voter ID requirements. In Texas, citizens must have one of several valid photo IDs, including a passport, driver’s license, state personal ID, a concealed carry gun license, or an “election ID certificate.” If a citizen doesn’t have one, a citizen has to produce a birth certificate, which can be ordered online or via mail in most cases. When a citizen applies for an ID in Texas, the fee, which ranges from $6 - $16, can be waived. The cost for a birth certificate is generally less than $5.
Advocates opposing photo ID requirements praised the two court decisions as a “perfect storm” in the legal battle to throw out voting requirements in many states (19 states have voter photo ID requirements of some kind). The decision turned on whether it was too hard for 600,000 Texans to get a valid photo ID. Less than 600 have been issued, representing one-tenth of one percent of the Texans who do not have a valid photo ID.
Voter photo ID requirements are routinely described by U.S. Justice Department attorneys and advocacy groups as “disenfranchising” for minorities, the poor, and the elderly. Too much burden. Too hard to accomplish. Too costly.
There’s an old saying that goes, “If you don’t vote, you can’t complain.” There’s been a lot of complaining by non-voters. But maybe there’s more to our story of American citizenship. Maybe there’s “too much burden” all over the place.
Take jury duty, for example. In 2012, only one out of five Dallas County residents who were summoned to jury duty actually showed up. In Harris County, which covers Houston, 30 percent of the people summoned in 2011 did not appear – that’s 148,000 people.
Truth is, jury duty can be a pain. For the average person, it requires leaving your home during work hours, traveling tens of miles to a courthouse, and spending hours waiting to be called for a case. While there are valid excuses for avoiding jury duty, the failure to comply is a criminal offense. In Texas, the fines can be as high as $1,000, and some wayward Texans have even served jail time – and Texas is less harsh than many states.
Under the same logic as the “burdensome” voter photo ID analysis used by the federal court in Texas, jury duty is unconstitutional. Too much trouble. Too hard to travel to the courthouse. Too expensive to miss work. Too much time away from family. Clearly unconstitutional. Sound familiar?
So, when can we expect the multi-state, coordinated legal assault by the combined forces of the U.S. Department of Justice and its allied raft of civil rights advocacy groups to challenge the unconstitutional burden of jury duty? If the courts’ reasoning holds, jury duty is on the chopping block – and all of the other hallmarks of American civic life, too. That’s how absurd the voter ID issue has become.
Cornerstones of representative democracy and living under the rule of law – like voting and jury duty – require participation by citizens. We engage as participants in our freedom. So we must proceed with caution as we judge what constitutes “too much burden.” As Veteran’s Day approaches, we’re reminded of what kind of burden we regularly ask Americans in uniform to carry. Think about that the next time you consider voter photo IDs.
Don’t you need ID to get an ID?
Dem po’ folks don’t want to wear out their I.D.s using them to vote. They need them to cash a check, rent a movie, buy beer and smokes and to attend DemocRAT “rallies” and “fundraisers”.
Just a typical devious ploy by Dems. They know the odds are far more likely they’ll cheat than Republicans. They want the odds in their favor....the less measures to counter voter fraud, the more Dems get elected. Simple as that.
Good point...no, great point. I hope the Pubs use this against the lyin’ Dims, til the cows come home to vote.
Or buying booze?
when visiting the ER to see a relative I had to show an ID to enter!!
Don’t you need ID to get an ID?
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the birth certificate is the key ID you need to get other IDs, such as driver’s licenses or passports.
The premise and illogic that poor people, certain ethnic groups, etc., should not have to show ID to prove ID to vote does not hold water, you have to have ID to register to vote. Everyone in society has to have some form of ID to engage in basic commerce.
So if the rule is you don't need ID to prove who you are to vote then why do we need any ID to do anything??????????
YES you do?
Supreme Court Allows Texas to Use Strict Voter ID Law in Coming Election
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3216936/posts
They say that the Texas law that was just upheld by SCOTUS allows a passport as an ID.That’s certainly a start...at least it shows you’re a US citizen.But it doesn’t show where you live.*I* have a US passport and don’t live within 2,000 miles of the Texas border...but it looks like I could vote there if I tried.
In fact, what republicans should do is require the Obamacare ID to vote. That way, a liberal judge can either rule that yes, ID is required to vote, because it is not a burden to require an ID that they already have, or no, a citizen is not required to have a health care ID, which will make ObamaCare optional. Let them choose which poison they wish to drink.
But how do you prove that that BC is yours?
Maybe not require it (0bolaCare ID) to vote, but allow it as a form of acceptable ID. That’d get the same point across, no?
You have to have ID to get an 0bola ID.
Birth certificates can be forged.
Going to work is too much of a burden.
The income tax is too much of a burden on honest, hard-working Americans.
Try that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.