Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dear US Navy: The Futuristic X3K Is What Littoral Combat Ships Should Be (Indonesian ship!)
Foxtrot Alpha ^ | 10/10/2014 | Tyler Rogoway

Posted on 10/10/2014 9:32:03 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The last decade has seen some pretty awesome looking warships hit waters around the globe. On the "blue water" side of things the Star Wars looking Zumwalt Class and the minimalist art-like Lafayette Class were clearly designed with stealth in mind. Yet the "brown water" is where the most exotic vessels roam, and this is precisely where the X3K was born to fight.

An Indonesian Combat Trimaran Designed In Sweden

The X3K was built by Indonesian-based Swedish boat builder North Sea Boats, and designed in part by renowned exotic boat builder LOMOcean Design LTD. The goal was to build a very stealthy, high-speed, multi-role missile boat that could dominate the complex littorals around Indonesia while still being affordable to procure and operate.

At 63 meters in length, the X3K is no small patrol boat, but with her trimaran wave piercing hull and twin MJP 550 water jets, she can keep up with much smaller boats and even follow them into areas where there is just six feet of water. She is powered by four MAN12 diesel engines that put out 1,800hp each, that can propel her up near 40 knots during sprints. She cruises leisurely in even rough sea states at 16 knots, and has a range of over 2,000 miles.

The X3K is said to have an extremely stealthy design, with its two sets of four-tube anti-ship missiles launchers shrouded behind flat panels above and behind the bridge. Eight Chinese built C-702 anti-ship missiles can be carried for use against medium and small sized targets, or against larger targets, if fired as a salvo. Alternatively, four deadly Saab RBS-15 Mk3 advanced cruise missiles can be carried for attacking both large ships and land targets at long ranges.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: indonesia; lcs; sweden; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2014 9:32:03 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
They are fast.
They are sleek.
They are futuristic.
They are stealthy.
They are unarmored.
They won't survive combat.
2 posted on 10/10/2014 9:35:20 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Little Crappy Ships (LCS).


3 posted on 10/10/2014 9:37:04 PM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

They are targets.


4 posted on 10/10/2014 9:39:35 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus; Jeff Head

bump


5 posted on 10/10/2014 9:58:08 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I don’t think we should be choosing U.S. Navy ships by how cool they look.


6 posted on 10/10/2014 10:00:55 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
They won't survive combat.

Combat with who? I suspect these will be used for piracy suppression, and I suspect they will do well at it.

I do not expect that these vessels will be taking on anyone's destroyers, cruisers, or aircraft carriers. Nor do I expect that the pirates that this ship will be hounding and harassing to have an air combat component.

7 posted on 10/10/2014 10:02:31 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


8 posted on 10/10/2014 10:11:35 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Combat with who? I suspect these will be used for piracy suppression, and I suspect they will do well at it.

I'd bet that you're right. But do navies really need vessels this fancy to deal with pirates???

9 posted on 10/10/2014 10:17:57 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
But do navies really need vessels this fancy to deal with pirates???

Maybe not all navies, but Indonesia's sure does. Piracy suppression and interdiction is its primary mission, and it's serious.

10 posted on 10/10/2014 10:25:08 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In shallow water, it will make a great artificial reef.


11 posted on 10/10/2014 10:32:38 PM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, just wait until we have our flying subs that can also orbit the planet!


12 posted on 10/10/2014 10:32:44 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

Yes, especially if they are unmanned. As much as these boats might be, they would save in terms of how no risk to human life.


13 posted on 10/11/2014 12:03:34 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

>> They are...

just interceptable vessels.


14 posted on 10/11/2014 1:27:34 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

They cant be seen with Radar....so one guy with a pair of Binocs can spot and direct fire.
Sometimes just because it has the toys don’t mean all the toys are worth it.


15 posted on 10/11/2014 5:37:04 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I’m there.


16 posted on 10/11/2014 5:37:27 AM PDT by AceMineral (One day men will beg for chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

standard and cruise missile armament suggests they are not intended merely for pirate suppression


17 posted on 10/11/2014 6:17:29 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

And I don’t think they can land helicopters.


18 posted on 10/11/2014 7:52:25 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Is anybody really building naval vessels that can sustain a beating and keep fighting? I thought that was the argument for keeping the battleships on and that argument lost with Clinton’s Admiralty.


19 posted on 10/11/2014 8:03:39 AM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I am concerned that we are putting huge investment into coastal defense vessels forourselves. It is as if we are giving up controlling the oceans and thinking we can protect our coasts against attacks from the sea without controlling that ocean.
20 posted on 10/11/2014 8:36:37 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson