To: sukhoi-30mki
They are fast.
They are sleek.
They are futuristic.
They are stealthy.
They are unarmored.
They won't survive combat.
2 posted on
10/10/2014 9:35:20 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: arthurus
Little Crappy Ships (LCS).
3 posted on
10/10/2014 9:37:04 PM PDT by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: arthurus
4 posted on
10/10/2014 9:39:35 PM PDT by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: arthurus; Jeff Head
5 posted on
10/10/2014 9:58:08 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: arthurus
They won't survive combat. Combat with who? I suspect these will be used for piracy suppression, and I suspect they will do well at it.
I do not expect that these vessels will be taking on anyone's destroyers, cruisers, or aircraft carriers. Nor do I expect that the pirates that this ship will be hounding and harassing to have an air combat component.
7 posted on
10/10/2014 10:02:31 PM PDT by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: arthurus
>> They are...
just interceptable vessels.
14 posted on
10/11/2014 1:27:34 AM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: arthurus
They cant be seen with Radar....so one guy with a pair of Binocs can spot and direct fire.
Sometimes just because it has the toys don’t mean all the toys are worth it.
15 posted on
10/11/2014 5:37:04 AM PDT by
Yorlik803
( Church/Caboose in 2016)
To: arthurus
And I don’t think they can land helicopters.
18 posted on
10/11/2014 7:52:25 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: arthurus
Is anybody really building naval vessels that can sustain a beating and keep fighting? I thought that was the argument for keeping the battleships on and that argument lost with Clinton’s Admiralty.
19 posted on
10/11/2014 8:03:39 AM PDT by
MSF BU
(Support the troops: Join Them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson