To: arthurus
They won't survive combat. Combat with who? I suspect these will be used for piracy suppression, and I suspect they will do well at it.
I do not expect that these vessels will be taking on anyone's destroyers, cruisers, or aircraft carriers. Nor do I expect that the pirates that this ship will be hounding and harassing to have an air combat component.
7 posted on
10/10/2014 10:02:31 PM PDT by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: John Valentine
Combat with who? I suspect these will be used for piracy suppression, and I suspect they will do well at it.I'd bet that you're right. But do navies really need vessels this fancy to deal with pirates???
9 posted on
10/10/2014 10:17:57 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: John Valentine
standard and cruise missile armament suggests they are not intended merely for pirate suppression
17 posted on
10/11/2014 6:17:29 AM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: John Valentine
I am concerned that we are putting huge investment into coastal defense vessels forourselves. It is as if we are giving up controlling the oceans and thinking we can protect our coasts against attacks from the sea without controlling that ocean.
20 posted on
10/11/2014 8:36:37 AM PDT by
arthurus
To: John Valentine
A smuggler with an RPG can do some serious damage to one of these things with one shot.
22 posted on
10/11/2014 9:51:37 AM PDT by
arthurus
To: John Valentine
Nor do I expect that the pirates that this ship will be hounding and harassing to have an air combat component. Maching gun with incendary rounds should do it.
THis is actually the second of the 4 ship order to enter the IN.
The first had a litle mishap
Trouble with carbon fibre: it's explodium
32 posted on
10/12/2014 7:15:15 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(In Soviet Russia, Police say "please" when demanding papers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson